Private Individual

Susan Koshy filed a suit against the Rotary Club of Kottayam and its members. The case was related to an application that was allowed, leading to the closure of the suit.

Rtn George Mathew, aged 82, is the plaintiff in this civil suit against the Rotary Club of Kottayam and its members regarding a dispute. The case was heard and judgment was delivered after several proceedings.

This is an execution petition filed by the Cooperative Departmental Employees Cooperative Society Ltd. No. K.294 against Radhika T P and others. The court has considered the matter and issued an order regarding the execution.

The case involves an execution petition filed by The Co­operative Departmental Employees Co­operative Society Ltd. against judgment debtors N Sivadasan and S Beena. The court considered the petition and found no steps taken by the defendants.

Mariyamma Anthrayose is the decree holder and has filed an Execution Petition against Saji and Vijayamma. The court dismissed the Execution Petition due to no steps being taken so far.

The case involves Self Employers Service Society as the decree holder, represented by S K babu, against multiple judgment debtors including C R Rajamma, Sarath Babu, C P Thankachan, and Pennamma Raghavan. The execution petition was closed as the decree holder was not represented in court.

Manoj Chacko is the plaintiff, represented by an advocate, who filed the suit against the Rama Varma Union Club and its members. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.

Self Employers Service Society is the decree holder filing an execution petition against Manu T P and others, seeking enforcement of a decree. The court found that the decree holder was not represented and closed the execution petition.

The plaintiff, Rajeev S. Nair, is claiming an amount of ₹2,72,000/- from the defendant, Gopalakrishnan C.V, for work related to leveling property. The defendant disputes the claim, stating there was no legal agreement.

The plaintiffs, including Dr. Boney Pilo and others, seek a declaration regarding the mutation of property that should belong to them. They have filed suit against the State of Kerala and others, asserting that the property was wrongfully mutated in the name of the fourth defendant, Kuruvila Mathai.