Case Summary
The petitioners, Sajan V K and Kusal P Anand, filed a petition to condone the delay in filing a restoration petition. The court found that the petitioner did not provide sufficient reasons or medical certification for the delay.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition for condonation of delay.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sajan V K
- Party Age
- 41
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Kusal P Anand
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- President, PRDS, Head Office, Eraviperoor, Thiruvalla
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- General Secretary, PRDS, Head Office, Eraviperoor, Thiruvalla
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- PRDS, Kothala Branch, Secretary, Kothala, Kooroppada Village
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhilash Mohan M A
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Anil Namboodiri
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
Condoning the delay in filing the restoration petition
Evidence:
Hence petition is dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Delay in filing
Case Code
Case between Sajan V K et al vs President, PRDS et al regarding condonation of delay in filing restoration petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Sajan V K et al vs President, PRDS et al regarding condonation of delay in filing restoration petition.