Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 65/2025

Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-03-29
Duration
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, M/S Mathew and sons Finance, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants who defaulted on payments. The court found that the defendants did not present any rebuttal evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the loan amount with interest. The court ruled that the plaintiff provided sufficient evidence.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendants to pay ₹1,34,150/- with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the loan amount with interest. The court ruled that the plaintiff provided sufficient evidence.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff provided compelling evidence supporting their claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff provided compelling evidence supporting their claim.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,34,150/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Four Thousand One Hundred and Fifty only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
M/S Mathew and sons Finance
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sreenivasan Nair K.S
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sindhu Sreenivas
Party Age
50
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Cum Guarantee Agreement, Voucher, Promissory Note, Office Copy of the lawyers Notice, Computer Print out of Loan account Statement.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Roy Vanchipurackal
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought recovery of ₹1,34,150/- along with applicable interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: It is ordered that the defendants to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 1,34,150/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirty Four Thousand One Hundred and Fifty only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Cum Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document outlines the terms and conditions under which the loan was provided.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Voucher
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document acknowledges the receipt of the loan amount by the first defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a formal promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a formal promise to repay the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3(a)
Document Type: Office copy of the Lawyers Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document notifies the defendants of their default in payment and demands payment.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5(a)
Document Type: Computer Print out of Loan account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document details the loan account transactions and outstanding payments.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.
Case Code Year
Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque issued towards legally enforceable debt

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Tue, 06/04/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 03/29/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs K C Jacob et al regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Srambickal Finance vs Muhammed Ajiladh et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajeev S. Nair vs Gopalakrishnan C.V regarding realization of money.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Susamma et al regarding realization of money.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won