Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 555/2020

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-01-25
Duration
approximately-4 years 3 months
Case Closed
Sat, 01/25/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd, provided a loan to the first defendant, Sam Lukose, for his business. The defendants defaulted on the repayment, leading to the filing of this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants to pay the sum of 68,037₹ with interest at the rate of 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendants to pay the outstanding amount with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved the case based on documentary and oral evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved the case based on documentary and oral evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The contents of Exhibits A1 to A4 would go to show that, defendants had availed of the loan and received the amount. Though PW1 was cross-examined, nothing could be brought out to disprove the alleged transaction.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1) It is ordered that the defendants no.1, 2, 3 and 4 to pay to the plaintiff the sum of 68,037₹ with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of institution of the suit till the date of realization of the sum.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sam Lukose
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
E.J.Dileep
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shemina Dileep
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheed
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan application, Demand promissory Note, Agreement, Copy of statement of account, Copy of Lawyer notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv.Benny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. James Mathen K.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv.Rayin K.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff sought to recover the loan amount from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise an amount of 68,037₹ (Rupees Sixty Eight Thousand and Thirty Seven only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover costs from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendants no.1 to 4.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the request for the loan amount.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Serves as evidence that the defendants agreed to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the terms agreed upon by the parties regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Copy of statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the outstanding balance due as of a specific date.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the demand made for repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves that the lawyer notice was sent.
Reference:
Ext.A6 series
Document Type: AD card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the receipt of the lawyer notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7 series
Document Type: Copy of minutes of resolution
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes that PW1 is authorized to represent the plaintiff.
Reference:
Ext.A9

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Ltd vs Sam Lukose et al regarding realization of money.

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Financial liability - dishonoured cheque

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Wed, 03/11/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 01/25/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 01/05/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Self Employers Leasing and Finance Limited vs K C Jacob et al regarding realisation of money.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Srambickal Finance vs Muhammed Ajiladh et al regarding realisation of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Rajeev S. Nair vs Gopalakrishnan C.V regarding realization of money.
THE MUNSIFF COURT, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/S Mathew and sons Finance vs Sreenivasan Nair K.S et al regarding recovery of loan amount.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Self Employers Service Society vs Susamma et al regarding realization of money.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won