Similar Cases
Based on: Commercial Suit. No. 66/2022 — Case between Mustafa Usman et al vs M/s. Indian Oil Corporation Limited et al regarding recovery of possession and damages for use and occupation.
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
Commercial Suit No. 20/2023
Case between A.G.Vijayan et al vs Susheela Narayanan et al regarding realisation of money
The case involves a dispute between the plaintiffs and defendants who are close relatives regarding a partnership firm and a dishonoured cheque. The plaintiffs demand repayment of an amount due after retiring from the partnership.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.148/2022
Case between M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd filed a suit against M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd for the recovery of arrears of license fee for a property. The defendants were set ex-parte for failing to appear in court.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
C S.595/2021
Case between M/s.Polaris Associates vs M/s.HSIL Ltd., The Branch Head, Consumer Business Office, M/s Somany Hone innovators Ltd. regarding realisation of money
M/s.Polaris Associates, represented by its proprietor Mani V, has filed a suit against M/s.HSIL Ltd. and other defendants for the realization of money due to losses incurred from defective products. The plaintiff alleges that service issues and defective products from the defendants have caused significant financial damage.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.703/2021
Case between M/s. Manuelsons Hotel Pvt Ltd vs District Collector, Kozhikode & State of Kerala regarding realization of amount.
The plaintiff, M/s. Manuelsons Hotel Pvt Ltd, is suing the defendants for a balance amount of ₹2,37,811/- due for accommodation provided during the National Games. The defendants include the District Collector and the State of Kerala, who claim that they have settled the account based on actual occupancy.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit. No. 14/2025
Case between HT & LT. Kozhikode vs Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited et al regarding settlement and dismissal.
HT & LT. Kozhikode is the plaintiff represented by K.K Paveen Kumar. The defendants include Shapoorji Pallonji and Company Private Limited and other individuals related to the case. The matter was settled between the parties and the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Commercial Suit
Dismissed
Commercial Suit No.8/2024
Case between Murshid Panginikkadan vs Rahul Sadasivan et al regarding a commercial dispute.
Murshid Panginikkadan and Abdul Nigash Parvesh T.T are the plaintiffs in a commercial dispute against Rahul Sadasivan and Y NOT Studios represented by Chakravarthy Ramachandran. The case was heard in the II Addl. Commercial Court of Kozhikode.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.702/2021
Case between Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited vs Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited regarding compensation for breach of contract.
Moidu’s Medicate Private Limited, represented by its Medical Director, is suing Wipro GE Health Care Private Limited for failing to deliver and install an MRI machine within the agreed timeline. The plaintiff claims to have sustained financial losses due to this delay.
Commercial Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit. No. 20/2025
Case between M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP et al vs Dr. Sujith A.K regarding recovery of possession and realization of amount
The plaintiff, M/s. Medimall Kunnamangalam LLP, is seeking recovery of possession and a sum of money from the defendant, Dr. Sujith A.K, for breach of a license agreement. The defendant failed to pay the agreed license fee and provide necessary financial statements.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 95/2017
Case between Satheesh Charly vs The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Satheesh Charly, seeks a declaration regarding his membership status in The Calicut Cosmopolitan Club after being expelled. The defendants argue that he was suspended and subsequently expelled for repeated misconduct.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 275 / 2019
Case between Jose Antony vs K.D. Antony et al regarding declaration and consequential injunction.
Jose Antony is the plaintiff seeking a declaration that certain properties were purchased using his funds fraudulently by his father K.D. Antony and siblings. The case involves disputes over property ownership and claims of misrepresentation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.447/2019
Case between Muraleedharan vs Premanandan et al regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Muraleedharan filed a suit against Premanandan and others regarding a boundary dispute and injunction related to property access. The plaintiff claims trespass by the defendants on the access way to his property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 345/2016
Case between Thottathil Pachukutty et al vs Thottathil Sulochana et al regarding recovery of possession of immovable property and mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Thottathil Pachukutty et al, claim ownership over a property from which the defendant, Thottathil Sulochana, allegedly encroached and constructed a house illegally. The case involves disputes over property boundaries and title.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 14 / 2021
Case between Girija vs Arunjith P et al regarding mandatory injunction and other connected reliefs.
Girija filed a suit against Arunjith P, Sasikumar P, and the Secretary of Thalakulathoor Grama Panchayath seeking a mandatory injunction for unauthorized construction on her property. The plaintiff claims the construction is illegal and seeks mesne profits for its usage.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.453/2022
Case between Hathikka KV vs Nisha regarding mandatory injunction and compensation.
Hathikka KV, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Nisha, the defendant, seeking a mandatory injunction to vacate the property used for unauthorized occupation and compensation for damages. The plaintiff claims the defendant has overstayed the agreement terms, and the property is needed for a medical shop.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.440/2023
Case between Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam vs Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam et al regarding declaration and recovery of possession.
Elias Puthiya Panthakalakam is the plaintiff seeking a declaration and recovery of possession of property gifted to him by his mother, Kamabi Puthiya Panthakalakam. The defendants are members of the plaintiff's family who dispute the validity of the gift.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 546/2017
Case between Madayi Usha et al vs Madayi Sivanandan et al regarding partition of properties
The plaintiffs are Madayi Usha and Madayi Meenakumari, and the defendants include Madayi Sivanandan and others regarding the partition of certain properties. The suit seeks to divide the ownership of properties inherited from their parents.
Original Suit
Partial
ORIGINAL SUIT No.175/2018
Case between Lakshmikutty Amma et al vs Kozhikode City Service Co-operative Bank et al regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, a husband and wife, are seeking a declaration regarding their life interest in a property previously settled to their son, the second defendant. They claim that a loan taken by the second defendant against the property was unauthorized as their consent was not obtained.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 572 /2012
Case between E.S. Santhadevi et al vs Sarada et al regarding recovery of possession and declaration of property rights
E.S. Santhadevi and E.S. Maheshkumar, the plaintiffs, are seeking recovery of possession of property from the defendants, who include Sarada and others. The case revolves around property rights and alleged trespass by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 261/1999
Case between T.N. Devaki vs Padmanabhan Nair et al regarding setting aside the partition deed
The plaintiff, T.N. Devaki, seeks to set aside the partition deed claiming fraud and undue influence exerted by the defendants, who are her relatives. The case revolves around the legitimacy of the shares allotted to her in a disputed property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.744/2023
Case between Anil. E. P vs Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Anil. E. P is the plaintiff, seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Samastha Kerala Jam-Iyyathul Muallimeen Central Council, the defendant. The plaintiff claims to be in possession of a property he leased and accuses the defendant of attempting to evict him unlawfully.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.208/2025
Case between Mohanan P.D vs The Manager, State Bank of India regarding declaration of valid title deed
The plaintiff, Mohanan P.D, filed a suit for declaration regarding the validity of a title deed after the original was reported destroyed. The defendant, State Bank of India, admitted the plaint claim in their written statement.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit Nos. 353/2024
Case between Shibu vs R. Rajagopalakrishnan et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
Shibu is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against R. Rajagopalakrishnan and others. The case arises from a dispute over property ownership and related claims.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 526/2025
Case between Usman. E vs N. K. Abdurahiman et al regarding declaration of document as null and void
Usman. E filed a suit against N. K. Abdurahiman and others for declaring a document as null and void and for its cancellation. The plaintiff claims that the defendants transferred property without proper consent, causing potential harm to the Priyadarshini Study Centre.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 523/2016
Case between Vilasini. P.K et al vs Asokan et al regarding partition.
The plaintiffs, Vilasini. P.K and others, are seeking a partition of property inherited from Korappan, while the defendants, Asokan and others, dispute the claim stating that the property is not partible. The court addressed the matter of shares among the plaintiffs and defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
MA (Arbitration) No. 19/2024
Case between Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd et al vs Arjun P.R regarding Arbitration proceedings
Cholmandalam Investment and Finance Co.Ltd filed a petition against Arjun P.R under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. The petitioner expressed an inability to trace the vehicle involved and failed to proceed with the matter as directed by the court.
Arbitration
Defendant Won
OS 64/2021
Case between KUNHABDULLA vs KUNHALI et al regarding partition of property
KUNHABDULLA, the plaintiff, is seeking a final decree in a partition suit against KUNHALI and other defendants regarding the division of property as per a preliminary decree. The property has been measured, and shares have been allocated to each party as per the court's decision.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 9/2024
Case between VAZHAYIL KUMARAN vs CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL et al regarding declaration and injunction
The plaintiff, VAZHAYIL KUMARAN, seeks a declaration of his right to vehicular access through the property of the defendants, CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AJMAL and CHERUPEEDIKAYIL AZEEZ. The plaintiff claims he has an easement right due to an oral agreement with a former owner.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Commercial Suit No.12/2024
Case between KPB Nidhi Ltd. vs Bipin P et al regarding realization of money
KPB Nidhi Ltd. filed a suit against Bipin P and others for the recovery of money related to a gold loan transaction. The plaintiff claims that the defendants fraudulently withdrew money intended for settling a loan.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.239/2021
Case between State Bank of India vs Ranjith K.K regarding realisation of money.
State Bank of India filed a suit against Ranjith K.K for the recovery of a personal loan amount. The defendant failed to repay the loan, leading to the bank taking legal action.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.27/2024
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Otto Motiv et al regarding realisation of money
The Bank of Baroda has filed a suit against M/s.Otto Motiv and its managing partners for failing to repay a loan of ₹10,00,000 sanctioned under the MSME scheme. Despite several reminders and a mediation attempt, the defendants did not repay the loan.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.31/2023
Case between Canara Bank, Thondayad Branch vs Jasmine.V et al regarding realisation of loan amount
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendants, Jasmine.V and Ranjith C.M, who defaulted on repayment. The case revolves around the loan agreement and the defendants' failure to comply with payment terms.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.74/2024
Case between Ahammed Roller Flour Mills Private Limited vs M/s. E.C.Food Products et al regarding realisation of amount
Ahammed Roller Flour Mills Private Limited is suing M/s. E.C.Food Products and Sainul Abid for a debt of Rs.10,73,727 due from food product purchases. The defendants failed to repay the amount owed despite multiple requests.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.124/2022
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. A B Marketing et al regarding realisation of amount
Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s. A B Marketing and its proprietor Byju.A for recovery of dues arising from multiple loans. The defendants defaulted on repayment, leading to the current suit for recovery.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.35/2025
Case between Canara Bank vs Surendran K regarding realisation of money.
This suit involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from Surendran K, the defendant, who defaulted on repayment. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to repay the sanctioned loan taken for his business.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.43/2023
Case between The Canara Bank Thamarassery Branch vs M/s. Mella Food Products et al regarding realisation of amount from the defendants.
The plaintiff, The Canara Bank, is seeking recovery of an outstanding loan amount from the defendants, M/s. Mella Food Products and its proprietress, Mini Baby, who have defaulted on repayment. The loan was issued for working capital for the defendants' business.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit. No. 79/2024
Case between The Federal Bank Ltd et al vs Abdul Rasheed N.K et al regarding recovery of loan amount
The Federal Bank Ltd is suing Abdul Rasheed N.K and Haseena T for the recovery of a loan of ₹11,44,297 due to non-repayment. The court found that the defendants failed to appear and owed the amount claimed.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.34/2023
Case between Canara Bank vs Proprietor, M/s. Dr. Richie Marketing regarding realisation of money
Canara Bank is the plaintiff seeking recovery of a loan amount from the defendants, who have defaulted on repayment. The defendants did not appear in court, leading to an ex-parte decree.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit. No. 25/2025
Case between State Bank of India et al vs Shanoop N.M regarding realisation of loan amount
The plaintiff, State Bank of India, is seeking to recover an amount of ₹19,12,241 from the defendant, Shanoop N.M, who defaulted on loan repayments. The plaintiff bank sanctioned a term loan and a cash credit loan to the defendant, who has failed to repay the amounts as agreed.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.52/2024
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs SWATZ (POC) Private Limited et al regarding realisation of loan amount
The case involves STATE BANK OF INDIA as the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from SWATZ (POC) Private Limited and its director Swati Raj. The defendants failed to repay the sanctioned loans leading the plaintiff to file this suit.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.25/2024
Case between Canara Bank et al vs M/S Mahima Supermarket et al regarding realisation of amount
The plaintiff, Canara Bank, is seeking repayment of a loan amount from the defendants, M/S Mahima Supermarket and its proprietor, Jadheer Ahammed. The defendants defaulted on the loan despite multiple demands.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No. 26/2024
Case between M/s Uco Bank Mavoor Branch, Kozhikode vs M/s Zenana Metals And Home Needs regarding realisation of money.
M/s Uco Bank Mavoor Branch is the plaintiff seeking to recover money from M/s Zenana Metals And Home Needs and other defendants. The defendants were called absent in the proceedings.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.32/2024
Case between E.K. Safiya vs Jigesh M regarding recovery of rent arrears
E.K. Safiya, the plaintiff, is seeking to recover unpaid rent from Jigesh M, the defendant, who has failed to pay rent for a commercial property leased for a bakery since November 2022. The defendant has been set ex-parte due to absence in court.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.55/2023
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs ARCHANA PRADEEP regarding realisation of amount.
The plaintiff, STATE BANK OF INDIA, is seeking to recover an outstanding loan amount from the defendant, ARCHANA PRADEEP, who defaulted on her loan repayments. The court found in favor of the plaintiff based on the evidence provided.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.300/2021
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA vs NADUVIL KAYALOTT OIL MILL regarding suit for realisation of amount.
The plaintiff, State Bank of India, has filed a suit against the defendant, Naduvil Kayalott Oil Mill, for the recovery of dues under various loan agreements. The defendant defaulted on loan repayments, prompting the plaintiff to seek recovery of the owed amount.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.59/2023
Case between STATE BANK OF INDIA et al vs Smt. BALKEES NOUSHAD regarding realisation of loan amount
The case involves the State Bank of India, which is seeking to recover a loan amount from the defendant, Smt. Balkees Noushad, who has defaulted on her vehicle loan payments. The plaintiff alleges that despite several demands, the defendant failed to repay the loan as agreed.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.180/2022
Case between Indian Overseas Bank vs Mr. Nasheed.C regarding realisation of loan amount
This case involves Indian Overseas Bank seeking repayment from Mr. Nasheed.C for a vehicle loan he failed to repay. The plaintiff claims that the defendant has defaulted on loan payments despite multiple demands.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit. No. 13/2023
Case between State Bank of India vs Thouseef P.P regarding money recovery
State Bank of India, represented by its chief manager, filed a suit against Thouseef P.P for the recovery of a cash credit loan defaulted by the defendant. The loan was initially granted under the Mudra scheme and later converted to a working capital term loan.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won
Commercial Suit No.36/2024
Case between The Federal Bank Limited vs Mrs. Salamma Kurian et al regarding recovery of loan amount
The plaintiff, The Federal Bank Limited, filed a suit against the defendants, Mrs. Salamma Kurian and Mr. Jelly Sebastian, for recovery of a loan amount of Rs.12,33,483.72/- due to non-payment. Despite multiple notices, the defendants failed to repay the loan.
Commercial Suit
Plaintiff Won