Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.124/2022

Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. A B Marketing et al regarding realisation of amount

Court
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Sri. Sidhik. K
Order Date
2025-09-08
Duration
approximately-3 years 10 days
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Canara Bank filed a suit against M/s. A B Marketing and its proprietor Byju.A for recovery of dues arising from multiple loans. The defendants defaulted on repayment, leading to the current suit for recovery.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount to the plaintiff with interest and to cover costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.13,86,792.72 to the plaintiff.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit, directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount to the plaintiff with interest and to cover costs.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants failed to repay the loan amount with interest as per the loan agreements.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants failed to repay the loan amount with interest as per the loan agreements.
Supporting Evidence
The unchallenged oral testimony of PW1 coupled with Exts.A1 to A7 documents very well show that the defendants failed to repay the loan amount with interest to plaintiff and now an amount of Rs.13,86,792.72 is due from the defendants to the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1.The defendants are directed to pay an amount of Rs.13,86,792.72 (Rupees thirteen lakh eighty six thousand seven hundred and ninety two and seventy two paise only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Relation
Rep. By Manager
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Neethu Ramesh
Party Age
33
Relation
W/o. Naveen A.P.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s. A B Marketing
Relation
Rep. By its proprietor
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Byju.A
Party Age
40
Plaintiffs Documents
Ext.A1: Letter of Sanction for Rs.10,00,000/- dated 06.10.2018, Ext.A2: Composite Hypothecation Agreement, Ext.A3: Guarantee Agreement, Ext.A4: The Sanction Memorandum for Rs.1,90,000/-, Ext.A5: Agreement Cum deed of hypothecation, Ext.A6: Pronote, Ext.A7: Attested Copy of the account statements.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Abdul Jaleel Onath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Shiji.N
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. P.N. Udayabhanu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt. Dayana.K
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount of Rs.13,86,792.72/- to the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Accordingly, the suit is liable to be decreed directing the defendants to pay the outstanding amount.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement for an interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realization of the decree.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for an interest at the rate of 6% per annum from the date of the suit till realisation of the decree.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Entitlement for costs of the suit.
Evidence:
The plaintiff will be entitled for costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Letter of Sanction
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the sanction for the loan of Rs.10,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This agreement outlines the hypothecation for the sanctioned loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Guarantee Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document serves as a guarantee for the repayment of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: The Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This memorandum details the sanction of Rs.1,90,000/- to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document relates to the hypothecation for the Rs.1,90,000/- loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Pronote
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This is the document issued by the 2nd defendant for the loan amount of Rs.1,90,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Attested Copy of the account statements
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document provides the account statements showing the transactions and outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. A B Marketing et al regarding realisation of amount
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs M/s. A B Marketing et al regarding realisation of amount

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Thu, 09/08/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 09/08/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between The Canara Bank Thamarassery Branch vs M/s. Mella Food Products et al regarding realisation of amount from the defendants.
IN THE COURT OF COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Canara Bank, Thondayad Branch vs Jasmine.V et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Otto Motiv et al regarding realisation of money
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Ranjith K.K regarding realisation of money.
Court of the Commercial Judge/II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KPB Nidhi Ltd. vs Bipin P et al regarding realization of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won