Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Commercial Suit No.35/2025

Case between Canara Bank vs Surendran K regarding realisation of money.

Court
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Judge
Smt. Vandana R
Order Date
2025-08-20
Duration
approximately-2 years 2 months 8 days
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This suit involves Canara Bank as the plaintiff seeking to recover a loan amount from Surendran K, the defendant, who defaulted on repayment. The plaintiff claims that the defendant failed to repay the sanctioned loan taken for his business.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total of Rs.13,39,333.48 along with interest until realization. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.13,39,333.48 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Case Type
Commercial Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favour of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay a total of Rs.13,39,333.48 along with interest until realization. The plaintiff is also entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff successfully proved that the defendant defaulted on the loan repayment through unchallenged evidence and documented acknowledgments of debt.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff successfully proved that the defendant defaulted on the loan repayment through unchallenged evidence and documented acknowledgments of debt.
Supporting Evidence
By the unchallenged evidence of PW1 coupled with documentary evidence, I find that the defendant has defaulted in repaying the loan amount.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.13,39,333.48 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Canara Bank
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Surendran K
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan sanction memorandum, Agreement cum deed of hypothecation, Copy of lawyer notice, Acknowledgment card, Acknowledgment of debt, Account statement, Non starter report
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt.Lissy K.K
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Abdul Gamal Nazar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.13,39,333.48 with interest and costs.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: (1) The defendant is directed to pay an amount of Rs.13,39,333.48 with 9% interest per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and thereafter @ 6% per annum till realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
(2) The plaintiff is also entitled to realise the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Memorandum
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document issued by the plaintiff bank at the time of granting the loan to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Agreement cum deed of Hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Agreement executed by the defendant in favor of the plaintiff bank at the time of loan granting.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice issued by the plaintiff to call upon the defendant to repay the outstanding amount.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Debt and Security
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents executed by the defendant acknowledging his liability towards the bank.
Reference:
Ext.A5 to A6
Document Type: Account Statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Statement showing the balance outstanding in the loan account of the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Non Starter Report
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Report related to the defendant's loan account status.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Commercial Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Canara Bank vs Surendran K regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Canara Bank vs Surendran K regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Commercial Court Kozhikode
Case Filed
Mon, 06/12/2023 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 08/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Canara Bank, Thondayad Branch vs Jasmine.V et al regarding realisation of loan amount
COMMERCIAL/III ADDL. SUB JUDGE, KOZHIKODE
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between The Bank of Baroda vs M/s.Otto Motiv et al regarding realisation of money
II Addl. Commercial Court/Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s.Eon Infrastructures and Developers Pvt. Ltd vs M/s.White Fort Constructions and Engineers Pvt. Ltd et al regarding realisation of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Ranjith K.K regarding realisation of money.
Court of the Commercial Judge/II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KPB Nidhi Ltd. vs Bipin P et al regarding realization of money
Commercial Court/ II Addl. Sub Judge
Commercial Suit Plaintiff Won