Similar Cases
Based on: ORIGINAL SUIT No.20/2023 — Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Chathamangalam Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due
48 matching cases found, ranked by shared legal context
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 509/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding suit dismissal for default
Indira, the plaintiff, was involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The case was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent during the hearing.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 510/2018
Case between Kelan vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default.
Kelan, the plaintiff, is involved in a suit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath, the defendant. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the case for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 511/2018
Case between Indira vs Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal for default
Indira filed a lawsuit against Koodaranhi Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
EP/85/2025
Case between Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd vs Ratheesh P K et al regarding execution of decree
The petitioner is Purameri Panchayath vanitha Co operative Society Ltd, and the respondent includes Ratheesh P K and others. The case involves the execution of a decree for payment of a debt, with the respondent expressing willingness to repay.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 19/2023
Case between Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd vs The Karassery Grama Panchayath regarding realization of an amount due from defendant.
Niravu Farmers Producer Company Ltd is the plaintiff seeking realization of an amount from The Karassery Grama Panchayath. The case was heard by the Court and resulted in a judgment rejecting the plaint due to no balance court fee paid.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 268 OF 2016
Case between Ismail et al vs G. Surendran et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The case involves plaintiffs Ismail, Najmudheen, Kunhalavi Haji, and Anwar Sadath suing defendants G. Surendran, Abdul Salm, Abdul Gafoor, and Sekkeena for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiffs were absent during the proceedings, leading to the case being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 314/2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs Mohammed Faisal and his wife Shejinamol seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction obstructing their access to a public road. Plaintiffs claim ownership and access rights to their property, while the Panchayath argues it holds valid authority to construct an Anganvadi on the disputed land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. No. 300 /2019
Case between Mr. John Peter vs Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Mr. John Peter filed a suit for a permanent prohibitory injunction against Edakkattuvayal Grama Panchayat and others. The matter was settled in mediation, and the terms were accepted by the court.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.No. 314 /2021
Case between Mohammed Faisal vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding interim injunction
The case involves petitioners Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol seeking an interim injunction against the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath to prevent construction on the northern side of their property. The court found the petition barred by res judicata as a similar matter had previously been decided.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S.No. 314 /2 021
Case between Mohammed Faisal et al vs Mulavukad Grama Panchayath regarding approved building plan
The petitioners, Mohammed Faisal and Shejinamol, are seeking relief concerning the construction of a building. The respondent is the Mulavukad Grama Panchayath.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS No. 08 / 2024
Case between Shaji Varghese et al vs Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat et al regarding temporary injunction
The plaintiffs, Shaji Varghese and Baby, seek a temporary injunction against the defendants, which include Thiruvaniyoor Grama Panchayat and Ajimon.K.M, to prevent them from trespassing on their property and demolishing a compound wall. The dispute centers on the ownership and boundaries of several plots of land.
Civil Suit
OS. No.1783/2022
Case between M.G. Siva prasad vs Secretary, Chenkal Grama Panchayath et al regarding Balance Court Fee
M.G. Siva prasad filed a suit against the Secretary of Chenkal Grama Panchayath and others regarding the remittance of balance court fees. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.432/2020
Case between Athira vs Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat et al regarding dismissal of suit
Athira, the plaintiff, filed a suit against Vilavoorkkal Grama Panchayat and its officials. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS NO. 113/ 2018
Case between Shibily vs Pallickal Grama panachayath et al regarding acceptance of witness schedule.
Shibily is the plaintiff seeking to declare a notice as null and void while also requesting to accept a witness schedule for examining the Panchayath Secretary. The defendants argue that the petition is barred by limitation and that the documents are not available.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 107/2018
Case between Chandrahasan et al vs The Secretary, Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves multiple plaintiffs led by Chandrahasan against the Kadakkavoor Grama Panchayath and its committee members. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiffs' absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.462/2021
Case between Kadeeja vs Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath regarding mandatory injunction
Kadeeja is the plaintiff claiming ownership over a property that the Kunnamagalam Grama Panchayath has converted into a public road. The plaintiff seeks an injunction to remove the construction on her property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 354/2021
Case between Mini vs Puzhakkara Nabeesa et al regarding Mandatory and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
The plaintiff, Mini, is the owner of a property and seeks to remove obstructions put up by the defendants, Puzhakkara Nabeesa and Subair, to access her property. The case revolves around the existence of a public pathway that has been obstructed by the defendants.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT 19/2018
Case between JASHILNADH. R vs VADAKKAYIL PATHU et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction and declaration
Jashilnadh. R is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against VADAKKAYIL PATHU and others, who are accused of attempting to unlawfully construct a retaining wall affecting the plaintiff's property rights. The case centers on the right of way to the plaint A schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 120/2024
Case between Kunhabdulla vs Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
This case involves Kunhabdulla, the plaintiff, who is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali, to prevent them from trespassing onto his property for a road widening project. The defendants allegedly entered the property without consent and marked sections they claimed were necessary for the road work.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 122/2024
Case between RAKHI @ RAGISHA vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, Rakhi @ Ragisha and Kamala, seek a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, including Vaniyam Veetil Muhammad Ali and others, who are alleged to have trespassed into their property to mark for road widening without consent. The plaintiffs contest the defendants' claims of rights over their property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO 124/2024
Case between SURESH vs VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction.
The case involves plaintiffs SURESH and RAHNA seeking a permanent injunction against defendants VANIYAM VEETIL MUHAMMAD ALI, AKHILA MARIYAT, C. K. NAZAR, K. T. K CHANDRAN, NADAPURAM GRAMA PANCHAYATH, and URALUNGAL LABOUR CONTRACT CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD. to restrain them from trespassing and committing acts of waste on the plaint schedule property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 22/2018
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
Anilkumar filed a petition to withdraw his suit against Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath with permission to file a fresh suit. The case involves a dispute over a pathway and compliance with legal procedures under the Panchayath Raj Act.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 108/2019
Case between Venugopalan Nair vs Padmini Gopinadhan et al regarding mediation settlement
Venugopalan Nair filed a suit against Padmini Gopinadhan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, with lawful terms agreed upon by both parties.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S 81/2024
Case between Reena Thomas et al vs Shibu Thandamparambil et al regarding dismissal for default.
The case involves plaintiffs Reena Thomas, Ponnappan, and Vinl S. Anil against defendants Shibu Thandamparambil, Vinayachandran @ Vijayan, and Koruthodu Grama Panchayath. The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed for default.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S. 216/2024
Case between Shanavas P.H. vs Mundakayam Grama Panchayath et al regarding dismissal of a suit.
Shanavas P.H. filed a suit against Mundakayam Grama Panchayath and its secretary. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No.69/2023
Case between Sunitha vs Udayanapuram Panchayathu regarding suit dismissal for default.
The plaintiff, Sunitha, initiated the suit against Udayanapuram Panchayathu. The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.656/2022
Case between Nubaisa vs Secretary regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
This case involves Nubaisa filing a suit against the Secretary of Mayyanad Grama Panchayath regarding a permanent prohibitory injunction. The plaintiff was absent during the court proceedings.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
OS. No.529/2020
Case between Mohandas vs Elampalloor Grama Panchayath et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiff, Mohandas, filed a suit against Elampalloor Grama Panchayath and others for a permanent prohibitory injunction. The case was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
O.S No. 804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit for mandatory injunction.
The plaintiffs, including P K Haridas and Ashalatha, filed a petition to withdraw their suit against the Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The suit was regarding a mandatory injunction to demolish a wall, which no longer exists.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S No.804/2019
Case between P K Haridas et al vs The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath regarding dismissal of the suit
The plaintiffs, P K Haridas and others, filed a suit against The Udayamperoor Grama Panchayath. The case involved a hearing on the substance of the matter and the court ultimately dismissed the suit.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
O.S.388/2020
Case between Kalarikandy Subash Babu (died), Durga Devi, Bindya, Sandya vs Kasthuri Bai, Ramani Bai regarding partition of property.
This case involves a partition dispute over property following a preliminary decree. The plaintiffs are seeking to appoint an Advocate Commissioner to measure and divide the suit properties as decreed.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
OS 146/2017
Case between Moideen.V.P vs Pathumma et al regarding setting aside a final decree
The petitioner Moideen.V.P seeks to set aside a final decree in a partition suit due to alleged non-receipt of summons. The respondents argue that the petitioner was aware of the proceedings and failed to appear knowingly.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 114/2024
Case between Canara Bank vs M/S U.B. Hardwares regarding suit dismissal
Canara Bank filed a suit represented by its Chief Manager against M/S U.B. Hardwares and its proprietor. The case was dismissed as not pressed by the court.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 152/2020
Case between Sujith K.M. vs P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, Sujith K.M., is seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against the defendants, P. Chandramathi @ Chandrika and P. Baburajan, to prevent them from trespassing into his property. The defendants are alleged to have attempted to construct a way through the plaintiff's land.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No.169/2021
Case between Panakkal Mammedkoya vs Fabir et al regarding partition
The plaintiff, Panakkal Mammedkoya, is seeking a partition of family property originally belonging to his mother. The defendants, Fabir and others, have not agreed to partition despite several demands.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.224/2024
Case between Saseendran vs Sreedharan et al regarding possession of property
Saseendran initiated this suit for possession of property against Sreedharan and others. The matter was settled in mediation, resulting in a decree based on the mediation agreement.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.301/2021
Case between M/s. Konari Enterprises vs M/s.K.M.Traders regarding return of money
The plaintiff, M/s. Konari Enterprises, is seeking to recover an amount due from the defendant, M/s.K.M.Traders, following a credit facility availed by the defendant. The defendant has failed to repay the amount despite repeated reminders and a lawyer's notice.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother, Sangeetha K., filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The suit was dismissed by the court as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 349/2021
Case between Dayaana K. vs Marunadan Malayalee et al regarding damages and mandatory injunction.
Dayaana K. filed a suit against Marunadan Malayalee and others for damages and mandatory injunction due to the publication of a defamatory news item. The case centers around the false allegations made against Dayaana in an attempt to defame her reputation.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No. 449/2024
Case between Punnya Ranjith vs State of Kerala, Deputy Director Education, General Convenor regarding suit dismissal
Punnya Ranjith, a minor represented by his mother Sangeetha K., filed the suit against the State of Kerala and other officials regarding a matter related to the educational event. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No : 450/2024
Case between Ishani S. Nair vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit.
Ishani S. Nair, a minor represented by her mother Neethumol, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other educational authorities. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO :451/2024
Case between Sravan Krishna vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissal.
This case involves a minor, Sravan Krishna, represented by his father, Shaji. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
Original Suit No. 38/2021
Case between Illath Abdul Majeed et al vs Minas Thenanchery regarding declaration and permanent prohibitory injunction.
The plaintiffs, consisting of Illath Abdul Majeed and K. Balaramakurup, are the President and Secretary of Nanmanda High School Society, and they have filed a suit against Minas Thenanchery. The case involves a dispute regarding the authority of the defendant to issue notices as President of the society after resigning from the position.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
Original Suit No : 163/2020
Case between Chathunni vs Kozhikode District Library Council et al regarding realisation of money
Chathunni, a consulting engineer, filed a suit against the Kozhikode District Library Council and its officials for unpaid supervision and estimate charges related to renovation work at the Mananchira Central Library. He claims to have been entitled to a higher payment for his services but was only compensated partially.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 508/2022
Case between Dileep Kumar vs Sunil kumar regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Dileep Kumar filed a suit against Sunil Kumar for a permanent prohibitory injunction concerning a property dispute. The case involves issues of shared property rights and unlawful attempts to access a well.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 564/2023
Case between Arabhi et al vs State of Kerala et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
The plaintiffs, who are minors represented by a next friend, filed a suit against the State of Kerala and other defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff did not adduce any evidence and the relief sought had become infructuous.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won
ORIGINAL SUIT NO : 588/2018
Case between V. Doraswami vs T. Rajeev et al regarding permanent perpetual prohibitory injunction
The plaintiff, V. Doraswami, is involved in a case against the defendants, T. Rajeev and K.S. Ashraf Ali, concerning a dispute over access to a property owned by the plaintiff. The plaintiff is seeking an injunction to prevent the defendants from trespassing and obstructing access to the property.
Civil Suit
Plaintiff Won
ORIGINAL SUIT No.17/2022
Case between Mandattil Bhaskaran vs Mekoth Parambil Vineesh regarding declaration of a false and fabricated settlement deed.
The plaintiff, Mandattil Bhaskaran, alleges that he was misled by the defendant, Mekoth Parambil Vineesh, into signing a settlement deed under false pretenses. The plaintiff seeks to declare this deed invalid and prevent the defendant from taking possession of the property.
Civil Suit
Defendant Won