| Niyamam AI

Displaying 18371 - 18375 of 21904

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Kunhi Mohammed et al vs Safiya et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 262 OF 2015

2019-04-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Parambattu Sulaiman vs Machingal Muhammed et al regarding Injunction

Injunction

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 337 OF 2017

Tirur Taluk

2019-04-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Velayudhan Chakkanath et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 420/2018

Malappuram

2019-03-06

0 years, 2 months, 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Kaappattakath Kalathil Naffesu vs Sinaba regarding restoration of suit

Civil Suit

KLML130004842017

Malappuram

2019-03-01

1 years, 9 months, 7 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Faisal regarding Enforcement Proceedings

Enforcement Proceedings

KLML130010462018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-03-06

0 years, 2 months, 16 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9650

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to not paying the required batta for proceeding with the case.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs failing to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs regularly failed to take necessary legal steps for their cases, leading to dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Petitioners' absence in court often resulted in the dismissal of their cases.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Required Steps

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?