ORIGINAL SUIT No. 337 OF 2017

Case between Parambattu Sulaiman vs Machingal Muhammed et al regarding Injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K.

Order Date

2019-04-12

Duration

Case Closed

Fri, 04/12/2019 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Parambattu Sulaiman initiated a suit for injunction against Machingal Muhammed and others. The plaintiff was absent during the hearing, while the defendants were represented in court.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiff, who was not represented in court during the hearing.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and not represented during the hearing.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and not represented during the hearing.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff's counsel reported no-instruction. Plaintiff called absent not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed with out costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Parambattu Sulaiman
Party Age: 50
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Machingal Muhammed
Party Age: 55
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Machingal Shihab
Party Age: 27
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Machingal Sadikh
Party Age: 22
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Machingal Moideen
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Machingal Riyas
Party Age: 19
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri. K.Mehroof Shihab
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.M.P.Hussain
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Suit for Injunction was dismissed.

Evidence: