Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 467 OF 2014

Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
SMT. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2016-07-18
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Kamarudheen and Yahutty filed a suit seeking an injunction against T.H. Abdurahiman and his children. The matter was eventually settled between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the matter was settled between the parties. Hence, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the matter was settled between the parties. Hence, the suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Key Reasoning:
The matter was settled.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The matter was settled between the parties.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit coming on this day for hearing before me in the presence of Sri.P. Praveen, P.V. Vinunadh, Advocate for plaintiff and of Sri. M.K. Moosakutty, Advocate for defendants and the court delivered the following: Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kamarudheen
Party Age
35
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Yahutty
Party Age
69
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
T.H. Abdurahiman
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Althaf Rahman
Party Age
27
Relation
Suppl.
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Irshad Rahman
Party Age
24
Relation
Suppl.
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.P. Praveen
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. M.K. Moosakutty
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Matter settled between the parties. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 07/01/2016 - 12:00
To
Fri, 07/31/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Plaintiff Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between M.P. Hajira et al vs Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won