Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 181 OF 2014

Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-08
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arakkal Veettil Moosa filed a suit seeking an injunction against Kuroor Hamza and his children. The case involved a compromise petition that was submitted by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was decreed based on a lawful compromise between the parties. The terms of the compromise will be incorporated into the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit for injunction was decreed based on a lawful compromise between the parties. The terms of the compromise will be incorporated into the decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise are lawful.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The terms of compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful, suit is decreed. Compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Arakkal Veettil Moosa
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kuroor Hamza(Died)
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sirajudheen
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashraf
Party Age
38
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunheevi
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suhara
Party Age
47
Relation
Child
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.M.A. Muhammed Rafeeq
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K.P. Khaleel Ibrahim
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff's suit for injunction is decreed as the terms of compromise are lawful.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, suit is decreed. Compromise shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 02/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Sat, 02/28/2026 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kottekkunnu Sree Durga Devi Kshethra Committee et al vs Gopalakrishnan et al regarding injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Janardhanan et al vs Kerala State Electricity Board et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Dismissed
Case between M.P. Hajira et al vs Anapadikkal Pathummakkutty et al regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won
Case between Kamarudheen vs T.H. Abdurahiman regarding injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Injunction Defendant Won