Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 181 OF 2014

Case between Arakkal Veettil Moosa vs Kuroor Hamza et al regarding injunction

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR
Judge
Smt. VINCY.T.V.
Order Date
2017-02-08
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Arakkal Veettil Moosa filed a suit seeking an injunction against Kuroor Hamza and his children. The case involved a compromise petition that was submitted by both parties.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was decreed based on a lawful compromise between the parties. The terms of the compromise will be incorporated into the decree.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of the compromise are lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful, suit is decreed. Compromise shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Arakkal Veettil Moosa (51 years years) Vettom Pallipram Amsom, Perunthallur Desom, PIN 676 102

Defendants

Kuroor Hamza(Died) (Age not specified years) Kuroor House, Vettom Pallipram Amsom and Post, Perunthallur Desom, PIN 676 102 Sirajudheen (45 years years) Ashraf (38 years years) Kunheevi (65 years years) Suhara (47 years years)

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff's suit for injunction is decreed as the terms of compromise are lawful.
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful, suit is decreed. Compromise shall form part of the decree.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur Taluk
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases