Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Muhammed Haji and Aminakkutty Umma, filed a suit for injunction against The Deputy Tahsildar, The Village Officer, and the State of Kerala represented by the District Collector. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Dismissed
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for default due to the absence of the plaintiffs during the hearing. The plaintiffs' counsel reported having no instructions to proceed with the case.
Key Reasoning:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed Haji
- Party Age
- 74
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aminakkutty Umma
- Party Age
- 71
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery)
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Village Officer, Kurumbathoor Village Office
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala represented by the District Collector
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.S. Hariharan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Gopi Kadavath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit for injunction dismissed for default due to absence of plaintiffs.
Evidence:
Name of plaintiffs is called. Absent. No representation. Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed Haji vs The Deputy Tahsildar (Revenue Recovery) et al regarding injunction