ORIGINAL SUIT No. 262 OF 2015

Case between Kunhi Mohammed et al vs Safiya et al regarding Injunction

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF OF TIRUR

Judge

Smt.NIMMI.K.K.

Order Date

2019-04-12

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Kunhi Mohammed and Musthafa as plaintiffs against Safiya, Faisal Ibrahim, and others as defendants regarding an injunction. The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was absent and not represented.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Injunction

Final Judgment

The suit for injunction was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff, with costs awarded to the defendants.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and not represented in court.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff's counsel reported no-instruction. Plaintiff called absent, not represented.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed with costs to D1 and D2.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Kunhi Mohammed
Party Age: 84
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Musthafa
Party Age: 48
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Safiya
Party Age: 55
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Faisal Ibrahim
Party Age: 37
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Kairunneesa
Party Age: 40
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Seenathunneesa
Party Age: 3
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Mohamed Ismail
Party Age: 30
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sri.M.K.Moosakutty
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Sri.M.A.Ismail
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction

Outcome: Refused

Description:

Suit for Injunction

Evidence: