Home | Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 96 - 100 of 4243

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Kunhipathumma vs Abdul Azees regarding EP 153/2016

Unknown

EP 153/2016

2019-02-28

2 years 8 months 15 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kunhipathumma vs Parambat Faisal et al regarding Decree

Execution Proceedings

EP 156/2016

Tirur,Malappuram

2019-02-28

2 years 8 months 15 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Kunhipathuimma et al vs Siddeekh regarding Decree Holder vs Judgment Debtor

Execution Proceedings

EP 155/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-28

2 years 8 months 15 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secratary vs Ramadas et al regarding Execution Petition

Execution Petition

EP 59/2019

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-03-20

0 years, 1 months, 14 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Sreeramani vs Radha regarding Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn. 2169/2018

Tirur, Malappuram

2019-02-27

0 years 4 months 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

42%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 4,243 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength Medium Impact

Average Case Duration 1.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 14%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 126 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 98 cases)
Jenm Assignment Deed (in 83 cases)
Commission Plan (in 79 cases)
Tax receipt (in 70 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 1779
Defendant Won: 1249

1249

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs failed to pay necessary fees, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Cases were dismissed due to plaintiffs not appearing in court when required.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Required Steps

Plaintiffs often failed to take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices, leading to dismissals.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Take Required Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?