| Niyamam AI

Displaying 106 - 110 of 21804

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between The Canara Bank et al vs Rahila Beevi.N regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No.11/2023

Kollam

2025-12-06

approximately-8 years 2 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sheeba. L vs Kiran Jerome et al regarding Counter Claim for Injunction.

Injunction

OS. No. 383/2018

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-7 years 7 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Anju et al vs Kerala State et al regarding Declaration and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 872/2018

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-7 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jacob.K.Baby et al vs Subhash regarding Eviction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 103/2021

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-4 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Willington vs K.M. Anto et al regarding damages.

Civil Suit

OS. No. 542/2018

Kollam

2025-12-08

approximately-7 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9603

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed due to their inability to pay necessary batta fees for filing or proceeding.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Many cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not provide sufficient evidence to support their claims.

Found in 32 cases (32%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Numerous petitions failed because plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, such as issuing notices.

Found in 27 cases (27%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioner in Court

Cases were often dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during important hearings.

Found in 16 cases (16%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Submitted

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioner in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?