| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 7961 - 7965 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Beeravunni et al vs Rafi et al regarding recovery of possession

Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 335 OF 2014

Tirur

2017-03-16

2 years 11 months 24 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Meenakshi vs Karunakaran et al regarding undisclosed matter

Unknown

FDA/1284/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-03-16

0 years, 9 months, 0 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Secretary vs Thirunnavaya kalathil Hamsa et al regarding debt satisfaction

Execution Petition - Debt Satisfaction

EP 185/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-03-16

0 years, 7 months, 29 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Velayudhankutty and Chandran vs Kunhutty et al regarding partition

Civil Suit - Partition

Restor.Ptn. 156/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-03-15

1 year, 2 months, 8 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Velakadan Siraj vs Chundam Veetil Pazhaya Ottayil Kaderkutty @ Bappu regarding unspecified matter

Restoration Petition - Medical Terms

Restoration Petition No. 2169/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-03-15

0 years, 5 months, 1 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay required batta, resulting in dismissal for default.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support claims regarding means to pay decree debts.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Non-Payment and No Steps Taken

Case dismissed for default due to plaintiff's inaction and non-payment of necessary fees.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner in court.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Non-Payment and No Steps Taken

Absence of the Petitioner

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?