Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
Restor.Ptn. 156/2016

Case between Velayudhankutty and Chandran vs Kunhutty et al regarding partition

Court
Court of Munsiff Magistrate
Judge
Smt. Vincy T.V.
Order Date
2017-03-15
Duration
1 year, 2 months, 8 days
Case Code No.
156
Case Closed
Wed, 03/15/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Petitioner filed a suit for partition which was allowed on 15-03-2017 on payment of costs of Rs.2000.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition was allowed on 15-03-2017 on exemplary terms with costs of Rs.2000.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition to be allowed on exemplary terms with costs of Rs.2000.
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition was allowed on 15-03-2017 on exemplary terms with costs of Rs.2000.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff was granted relief as the suit for partition was allowed on 15-03-2017.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff was granted relief as the suit for partition was allowed on 15-03-2017.
Supporting Evidence
It is a Suit for partition. It has to be allowed for giving the party an opportunity to contest the matter. But it can be allowed only on exemplary terms. On payment of costs of Rs.2000-.

Judgment Evidence:

Petition allowed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Velayudhankutty
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Chandran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunhutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parakkal Ramakrishnan @ Balan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vasu @ Subrahmanyan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chandran
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sekharan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kunhi @ Kalikutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bharathi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thanka
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ramani
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Unni @ Balakrishnan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rathna
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Vinayakumari
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Chinnu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kali @ Thankamalu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Santha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anandam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kallyani
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radha
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mani
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V.Chandrasekharan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Advocate
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Allowing partition on exemplary terms with costs of Rs.2000.
Evidence:
Petition allowed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN.
Case Code Year
2016

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Malappuram
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Wed, 01/13/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Wed, 03/15/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 03/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 03/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between M.S.Krishnakumari et al vs M.S.Unnikrishnan regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiffs
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kallyani Gunasekharan et al vs M.Rajan regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won