ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 335 OF 2014

Case between Beeravunni et al vs Rafi et al regarding recovery of possession

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-03-16
Duration
2 years 11 months 24 days
Case Closed
Thu, 03/16/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Four plaintiffs filed a suit against two defendants for recovery of possession, but the suit was dismissed as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit for recovery of possession was dismissed for default as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession
Final Judgment
No
The suit for recovery of possession was dismissed for default as the plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beeravunni
Party Age
69
Relation
Child of Karatukadavath Pattayil Moideenkutty @ Bava
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdulla
Party Age
67
Relation
Child of Karatukadavath Pattayil Moideenkutty @ Bava
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Moideen
Party Age
65
Relation
Child of Karatukadavath Pattayil Moideenkutty @ Bava
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Kasmi
Party Age
63
Relation
Child of Karatukadavath Pattayil Moideenkutty @ Bava
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rafi
Party Age
42
Relation
Son of Kulangara Veettil Moideen @ Bappu
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Amina
Party Age
36
Relation
Wife of Kulangara Veettil Rafi
Plaintiffs Documents
Not available
Defendants Documents
Not available

Advocates

Reliefs

Relief Type: Not Decided
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Recovery of possession
Evidence:
Plaintiff's counsel reported no instructions from the client. Name of the plaintiff is called absent. Defendant represented. Hence suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Beeravunni et al vs Rafi et al regarding recovery of possession
Case Code Year
Case between Beeravunni et al vs Rafi et al regarding recovery of possession

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 03/16/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 03/16/2017 - 12:00
From
Wed, 03/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 03/31/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Jasmin.P.P. vs Cherupurakkal Nafeesumma et al regarding recovery of possession
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession Defendant Won
Case between Omer Shereef.P vs Mohammed Ismayil regarding possession of property
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession Plaintiff Won
Case between Abdu Salam vs Basheer.C. regarding possession recovery
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of possession Defendant Won
Case between Rema et al vs Aalampatta Krishnankutty et al regarding property possession
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession Defendant Won
Case between Raman @ Ponnu vs Aramughan regarding recovery of possession
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Recovery of Possession Partial