| Niyamam AI

Displaying 326 - 330 of 21805

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Punjab & Sind Bank vs Nijana Nasarudeen regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 79/2022

Kollam

2025-08-05

approximately-9 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kerala Gramin Bank vs Sarala et al regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 169/2025

Kollam

2025-08-05

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Jayaprasad.V. vs Jaya Kumar.V et al regarding Partition and Recovery of rent

Civil Suit

OS. No. 1003/2015

Kollam

2025-08-06

approximately-10 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Presanna.P. vs Rajan regarding Realisation of Money

Civil Suit

OS. No. 673/2022

Kollam

2025-08-06

approximately-6 years 23 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Beena vs Jayan et al regarding Declaration and Injunction

Civil Suit

OS. No. 743/2023

Kollam

2025-08-06

approximately-2 years 26 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9602

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment

Numerous petitions were dismissed for failure to pay the required batta or fees.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Petitioners frequently failed to provide sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove financial means.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Many cases were dismissed due to the petitioner's absence during hearings and proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Notices

Dismissing petitions for not taking steps to issue notices to respondents was a common issue.

Found in 14 cases (14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment

Lack of Evidence Presented

Absence of the Petitioner

Failure to Issue Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?