Case Summary
The plaintiffs are Presanna.P. and Akhil Sivakumar, who claim that the defendants, Rajan, Roshi Raj, and Maniprasanna.R, owe them a total of Rs. 7,34,171/- due to borrowed amounts. The defendants failed to repay despite multiple demands.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Plaintiffs are entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 7,34,171/- together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiffs, granting them the right to recover Rs. 7,34,171/- along with interest from the defendants.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The evidence clearly established that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs.
The evidence clearly established that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The evidence clearly established that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs.
The evidence clearly established that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence clearly established that the defendants are indebted to the plaintiffs. There is no contra evidence to prove otherwise.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Plaintiffs are entitled to realise an amount of Rs. 7,34,171/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Thirty Four Thousand One Hundred and Seventy One only) together with interest...
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Presanna.P.
- Party Age
- 62
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Akhil Sivakumar
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rajan
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Roshi Raj
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Maniprasanna.R
- Party Age
- 63
Plaintiffs Documents
Statement of accounts, cheques, evidence of borrowed amounts.
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Laila I.S @ Laila Sunil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Maruthadi.S.Navas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Recovery
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are entitled to realise an amount of Rs.7,34,171/- together with interest.
Evidence:
In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: Plaintiffs are entitled to realise an amount of Rs.7,34,171/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Thirty Four Thousand One Hundred and Seventy One only) together with interest at the rate of 12% per annum for the principal amount of Rs.6,00,000/- from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type:
Costs
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Costs shall follow the event.
Evidence:
Hence, there is no reason to deviate from the rule 'costs shall follow the event.'
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Statement of Account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaint claim regarding the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type:
Cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the transaction on the date of borrowing.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type:
Statement of Account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaint claim regarding the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type:
Statement of Account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaint claim regarding the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type:
Statement of Account
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the plaint claim regarding the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type:
Cheque
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the transaction on the date of borrowing.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Presanna.P. vs Rajan regarding Realisation of Money
Case Code Year
Case between Presanna.P. vs Rajan regarding Realisation of Money
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act