| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1811 - 1815 of 21897

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Ayishabeevi vs Yoosafkoya Thangal V.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 277/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-19

approximately-3 years 4 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ace Finlease Pvt Ltd vs Sainul Abid C et al regarding realisation of money.

Civil Suit

Original Suit No. 50/2022

Kozhikode

2025-09-19

approximately-5 years 7 months 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Ali. P.M vs V.K. Sasi regarding eviction and rent arrears

Rent Control Petition

RCP 58/2019

Kozhikode District

2025-09-19

approximately-6 years 1 day

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Padmini vs Ragina et al regarding partition

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No. 239/2025

Kozhikode

2025-09-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shysi.I vs Kunhahammed regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT No.108/2024

Kozhikode

2025-09-20

approximately-1 year 22 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9647

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

29%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required fees, leading to case dismissals.

Found in 29 cases (29%) High Impact

Failure to Present Evidence

Lack of sufficient evidence to support claims was a common reason for case dismissals.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Plaintiffs often did not appear in court, resulting in their petitions being dismissed for default.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Instances where plaintiffs did not take required legal steps led to dismissals of their petitions.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Failure to Present Evidence

Non-Representation in Court

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?