Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 277/2022

Case between Ayishabeevi vs Yoosafkoya Thangal V.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt. Savitha T.P
Order Date
2025-09-19
Duration
approximately-3 years 4 months
Case Closed
Fri, 09/19/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ayishabeevi is the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction against Yoosafkoya Thangal V.C and Mariyam Muthubheevi. The dispute involves the possession and access to property originally belonging to Nafeesa Hajumma.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and awarding costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendants are restrained by a prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from obstructing civil work.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendants from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and awarding costs of the suit to the plaintiff.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The ownership and possession of the plaintiff over plaint A schedule property is proved by the evidence presented.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The ownership and possession of the plaintiff over plaint A schedule property is proved by the evidence presented.
Supporting Evidence
The ownership and possession of the plaint A schedule property is proved by Exhibit A1 that is Deed No. 3309/2018. The evidence put forth by the plaintiffs remains unchallenged.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is decreed as follows: The defendants are restrained by a prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and from obstructing the civil work or committing any waste and damage to plaint A schedule property.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayishabeevi
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Yoosafkoya Thangal V.C
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Mariyam Muthubheevi
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Certified Copy of Settlement Deed No. 3309/2018, Building tax receipt from Kozhikode Corporation, Land tax receipt from Village Office, Nellikkode.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Anil Viswanath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. M.T. Sasidharan
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Shanif M.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are restrained from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and obstructing civil work.
Evidence:
Hence, I find that the defendants shall be restrained by prohibitory injunction from trespassing into plaint A schedule property and thereby obstructing the civil work or committing any waste and damage to property.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendants are directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiffs.
Evidence:
The defendants are also directed to pay the costs of the suit to the plaintiffs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves the ownership and possession of the plaint A schedule property as per Deed No. 3309/2018.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms payment of building tax for the house situated in the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms payment of land tax for the plaint A schedule property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
References a prior assignment of property to the defendant No. 1.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Judgment in OS 108/2022 supporting the plaintiff's claims.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayishabeevi vs Yoosafkoya Thangal V.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Ayishabeevi vs Yoosafkoya Thangal V.C et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Sun, 05/15/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 09/19/2025 - 12:00
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won