Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT No. 239/2025

Case between Padmini vs Ragina et al regarding partition

Court
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF -II, KOZHIKODE
Judge
Smt.ANJALI. P
Order Date
2025-09-20
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Padmini filed a suit for partition against Ragina, Nishanth Kumar, and Roshna. The parties settled their disputes amicably through mediation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
A composite decree for partition was passed, allotting plot A to the plaintiff and plot B jointly to the defendants. The mediation agreement was accepted by the court.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Composite decree for partition
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
A composite decree for partition was passed, allotting plot A to the plaintiff and plot B jointly to the defendants. The mediation agreement was accepted by the court.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Parties settled their disputes amicably through mediation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Parties settled their disputes amicably through mediation.
Supporting Evidence
The parties have agreed that the plot A in the plan appended to the mediation report be allotted to the share of the plaintiff and the plot B be jointly allotted to the share of the defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, a composite decree for partition is passed as follows: 1. The plot A admeasuring 11. 50 cents of land shown in the plan appended to the mediation agreement is allotted to the share of the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Padmini
Party Age
68
Relation
W/o.Late T.P.Dasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ragina
Party Age
47
Relation
D/o.T.P.Dasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nishanth Kumar.T.P
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o.T.P.Dasan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Roshna.T.P
Party Age
41
Relation
D/o.T.P.Dasan
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri.Roshin
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.T.V.Priyesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plot A admeasuring 11.50 cents of land is allotted to the share of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
The plot A admeasuring 11.50 cents of land shown in the plan appended to the mediation agreement is allotted to the share of the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plot B admeasuring 11.50 cents of land is allotted jointly to the share of the defendants.
Evidence:
The plot B admeasuring 11.50 cents of land shown in the plan appended to the mediation agreement is allotted jointly to the share of the defendants.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The mediation agreement and the plan shall form part of the composite decree.
Evidence:
The mediation agreement and the plan appended thereto shall form part of the composite decree.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Mediation Agreement
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The mediation agreement and the plan appended thereto were accepted by the court for settling disputes.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Padmini vs Ragina et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Padmini vs Ragina et al regarding partition

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court 2 Kozhikode
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 09/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Wed, 12/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Kolassery Abdurahim vs Kanjirangal Kareem et al regarding property delivery
Rent Control Court
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. UCO Bank vs Abhinav.K.P et al regarding dismissal of suit.
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Girija et al vs Komalam et al regarding partition
MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Fathima Minha.K vs State of Kerala et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF-II, KOZHIKODE
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between M Sukumaran vs K. Ahammed et al regarding perpetual prohibitory injunction
Munsiff-II, Kozhikode
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won