| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17236 - 17240 of 22110

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between V.M. Muhammad Azeem vs V.M Muhammad Afsal et al regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence.

Civil Suit

O.S No . 97/2023

Ernakulam

2025-06-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Geojit Financial Services Limited vs Dhake Group of Hotels Private Limited regarding dismissal of suit

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 241/2023

2025-06-11

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between V. Suma vs Anu Krishnakumar et al regarding dismissal due to non-attendance.

Civil Suit

O.S No .1245/2016

Ernakulam

2025-06-12

approximately-8 years 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C.K Jinan et al vs V.K Udayan regarding Decree Execution

Execution Petition

E.P No. 262/2024

Ernakulam

2025-06-12

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mathew Francis Alappat vs Suby brown et al regarding Enforcement Petition

Civil Suit

O.S No. 416/2016

Ernakulam

2025-06-12

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9747

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

27%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay required batta, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 27 cases (27%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Inadequate evidence was provided to support claims, resulting in dismissal for lack of proof.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Plaintiffs often did not take required procedural steps, leading to case dismissal for default.

Found in 22 cases (22%) Medium Impact

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

The absence of the plaintiff during hearings frequently resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 17 cases (17%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Necessary Steps

Absence of Plaintiff in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?