Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 97/2023

Case between V.M. Muhammad Azeem vs V.M Muhammad Afsal et al regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-11
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves V.M. Muhammad Azeem as the plaintiff and V.M Muhammad Afsal along with Bhimraj Rajpurohit as defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence. The defendant was present, but the plaintiff failed to appear.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence led to the dismissal of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V.M. Muhammad Azeem (60 years years) Valiyaveettil, Hamsakunj Lane, Ernakulam North.P.O, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam Village, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 018.

Defendants

V.M Muhammad Afsal (55 years years) Valiyaveettil, MIR Green Metropolis, Emerald Park, Kunnumpuram, Kakkanad Village, Ernakulam District, Pin – 682 030. Bhimraj Rajpurohit (36 years years) Odawara Village, Jolore-Taluk, Rajastan, Pin 343 042.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases