Case Summary
This case involves V.M. Muhammad Azeem as the plaintiff and V.M Muhammad Afsal along with Bhimraj Rajpurohit as defendants. The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence. The defendant was present, but the plaintiff failed to appear.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence led to the dismissal of the case.
The plaintiff's failure to appear and present evidence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- V.M. Muhammad Azeem
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- V.M Muhammad Afsal
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhimraj Rajpurohit
- Party Age
- 36
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Praveen K. Joy
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Unnikrishnan M.P
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhilash N
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- K.R Vinod
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.S Latha
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kurian Maxie
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Krishna Bindhu
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Aswin Venugopal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The court dismissed the case as the plaintiff was not present or ready for evidence.
Evidence:
Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V.M. Muhammad Azeem vs V.M Muhammad Afsal et al regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence.
Case Code Year
Case between V.M. Muhammad Azeem vs V.M Muhammad Afsal et al regarding dismissal of suit due to plaintiff's absence.