Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No .1245/2016

Case between V. Suma vs Anu Krishnakumar et al regarding dismissal due to non-attendance.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
approximately-8 years 6 days
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, V. Suma, initiated a suit against Anu Krishnakumar and her children. The court dismissed the case since the plaintiff was not present or ready to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to plaintiff's absence during the hearing. The plaintiff was not present to provide evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to plaintiff's absence during the hearing. The plaintiff was not present to provide evidence.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present or ready to provide evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was not present or ready to provide evidence.
Supporting Evidence
Both represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed with cost. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 12th day of June, 2025).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
V. Suma
Party Age
49
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Anu Krishnakumar
Party Age
42
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ananthakrishnan
Party Age
15
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Keerthana
Party Age
11
Relation
Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Rajagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ann Marry Abraham
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
R. Rajesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Keshavkrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. Shankar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Libin Stanley
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Both represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between V. Suma vs Anu Krishnakumar et al regarding dismissal due to non-attendance.
Case Code Year
Case between V. Suma vs Anu Krishnakumar et al regarding dismissal due to non-attendance.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 06/12/2025 - 12:00
From
Sun, 06/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 06/30/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won