Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No .1245/2016

Case between V. Suma vs Anu Krishnakumar et al regarding dismissal due to non-attendance.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-06-12
Duration
approximately-8 years 6 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, V. Suma, initiated a suit against Anu Krishnakumar and her children. The court dismissed the case since the plaintiff was not present or ready to present evidence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit due to plaintiff's absence during the hearing. The plaintiff was not present to provide evidence.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was not present or ready to provide evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

Dismissed with cost. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 12th day of June, 2025).

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

V. Suma (49 years) Apartment No: 1C1, bearing Kochi Corporation Door No: 54/2857-F2, Asset Portico Phase II, Muttathil Lane, Elamkulam Village, Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam

Defendants

Anu Krishnakumar (42 years) Keerthi, C.L.Anand Lane, M.G.Road, Ernakulam Ananthakrishnan (15 years) Keerthi, C.L.Anand Lane, M.G.Road, Ernakulam Keerthana (11 years) Keerthi, C.L.Anand Lane, M.G.Road, Ernakulam

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of readiness for evidence.
Evidence:
Both represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed with cost.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 01/01/2016 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases