| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17131 - 17135 of 22137

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Sam Mathew vs Abdul Khader et al regarding E.P No. 197/2020

E.P

O.S No. 42/2010

Ernakulam

2025-07-07

approximately-5 years 6 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between M.P Somasekharan Pillai vs Sajikumar S regarding delivery of items in the inventory list.

Execution Petition

E.P No. 137/2025

Ernakulam

2025-07-05

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Narayana Dharma Poshini Sabha et al vs Tripunithura Municipality et al regarding dismissal for default of the suit.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 771/2021

Ernakulam

2025-07-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY vs Bijoy Josey regarding Court Fee Payment

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1046/2024

Ernakulam

2025-07-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Pratheeksha Kuries and Investments Pvt. Ltd. vs Neena Lavakumar regarding out of court settlement.

Civil Suit

O.S. No. 1094/2022

Ernakulam

2025-07-05

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9764

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

35%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Plaintiffs lacked sufficient evidence to support their claims or prove debtor's means to pay.

Found in 35 cases (35%) High Impact

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Petition was dismissed due to plaintiff's failure to pay necessary court fees or batta.

Found in 25 cases (25%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Petitioner

Plaintiffs frequently failed to appear in court, leading to dismissal of their petitions.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

No Steps Taken in the Case

Plaintiffs did not take necessary procedural steps, resulting in dismissal for inactivity.

Found in 12 cases (12%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Provide Necessary Evidence

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of the Petitioner

No Steps Taken in the Case

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?