Case Summary
Sam Mathew, represented by his Power of Attorney holder, filed a decree enforcement petition against Abdul Khader and other defendants. The case revolves around the enforcement of a decree where the decree holder was not present for the inquiry.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
E.P
Final Judgment
No
The enforcement petition filed by Sam Mathew was dismissed by the court due to the decree holder's absence and lack of readiness for the inquiry despite multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder failed to appear for the inquiry as ordered.
The decree holder failed to appear for the inquiry as ordered.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder failed to appear for the inquiry as ordered.
The decree holder failed to appear for the inquiry as ordered.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder not present or ready for enquiry as ordered despite numerous chances and postings as last chance no further time.
Judgment Evidence:
E.P dismissed. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 07th day of July 2025)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Sam Mathew
- Party Age
- 68
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Abdul Khader
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dinesh Gopal
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Chandrika Gopal
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sunil Kumar
- Party Age
- 56
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- T.V Seena
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.P Ramnath
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Bepin Paul
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sandhya S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Shalu Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- P. Rajesh Kottakkal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Varghese Varghese M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Deepak S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Antony Tharian
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- George Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- V. A Johnson
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Hakhim
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Joseph George
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- M.A Jinsamol
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Execution petition dismissed due to the decree holder not being present or ready for enquiry.
Evidence:
E.P dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
E.P
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Sam Mathew vs Abdul Khader et al regarding E.P No. 197/2020
Case Code Year
Case between Sam Mathew vs Abdul Khader et al regarding E.P No. 197/2020