Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 1046/2024

Case between ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY vs Bijoy Josey regarding Court Fee Payment

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-05
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Archdiocese of Verapoly, represented by Rev. Fr. Mathew Sojan Maliekkal, filed a suit against Bijoy Josey. The case was rejected due to non-payment of balance court fee despite multiple chances.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court rejected the suit due to failure to pay the required court fee after several chances were given.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court rejected the suit due to failure to pay the required court fee after several chances were given.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court fee requirements.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff failed to comply with court fee requirements.
Supporting Evidence
Balance Court Fee not paid despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit rejected. (Pronounced by me in the open court on this the 05th day of July, 2025).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bijoy Josey
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
L. Aloysius Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
George Thomas L
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Ranimol M.T
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Krishnapriya M.S
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit rejected due to balance court fee not paid.
Evidence:
Both represented. Balance Court Fee not paid despite numerous chances and posting as last chance no further time. Suit rejected.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY vs Bijoy Josey regarding Court Fee Payment
Case Code Year
Case between ARCHDIOCESE OF VERAPOLY vs Bijoy Josey regarding Court Fee Payment

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won