| Niyamam AI

Displaying 17086 - 17090 of 22158

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Crystal Travel and Tours et al vs Brane Enterprises Ltd. et al regarding dismissal for default.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 1329/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-20

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between C A. Sudhakaran vs Aykkannandha Pradarssini Sabha et al regarding decree enforcement

Civil Suit

O.S No. 775/2011

Ernakulam District

2025-08-20

approximately-14 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mary Raju vs Sabeena regarding Rent Control Petition

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 30/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-19

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s. Sacramento Ventures vs Peters Kudumbilan regarding settlement in mediation.

Civil Suit

O.S No. 94/2025

Ernakulam

2025-08-19

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Reji Joffy vs Sunil Krishnan regarding rent compliance

Rent Control Petition

R.C.P. No. 15/2024

Ernakulam

2025-08-11

approximately-1 year 28 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9772

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

24%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Multiple dismissals occurred due to plaintiffs not paying the required batta for proceeding with their cases.

Found in 24 cases (24%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence

Plaintiffs frequently failed to provide necessary evidence to demonstrate claims or financial capabilities.

Found in 20 cases (20%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Numerous cases were dismissed because plaintiffs did not take procedural steps like issuing notices.

Found in 18 cases (18%) High Impact

Non-Representation in Court

Many petitions were dismissed because the plaintiffs were absent or failed to represent themselves adequately.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence

Failure to Take Steps

Non-Representation in Court

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?