| Niyamam AI

Displaying 1531 - 1535 of 21892

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Soopy Mambilakkool vs Pakran et al regarding partition and separate possession

Civil Suit

Original Suit No 100/2025

Nadapuram, Vatakara Taluk, Kozhikode District

2025-12-20

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between RASIYA vs 1ASHIK, BASHEER regarding settlement terms.

Civil Suit

FDIA. No. 16/2024 in OS. No. 06/2024

Wayanad District

2025-04-07

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THRESIAMMA et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Civil Suit

ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 72/2024

Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State

2025-04-05

approximately-0 years 9 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sree Gokulam Chit and Finance Company Pvt Ltd. vs Moidu M.K regarding dishonor of cheque under NI Act

Criminal Case

S.T. No. 35/2023

Nadapuram

2025-04-08

approximately-5 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Rajeevan vs Naseema et al regarding setting aside an exparte order

Civil Case

RPIA. No. 23/2024

Nadapuram

2025-04-08

approximately-7 months 6 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9643

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiff failed to pay necessary fees, leading to dismissal for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Presented

Plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support claims or prove the means of the respondents.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Plaintiff failed to take necessary legal steps, such as issuing notices to respondents.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Absence of the Plaintiff

The court dismissed cases where the plaintiff was absent, resulting in default.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Presented

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of the Plaintiff

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?