Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 72/2024

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THRESIAMMA et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-04-05
Duration
approximately-0 years 9 months
Case Closed
Sat, 04/05/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

KERALA GRAMIN BANK is involved in a suit against THRESIAMMA and others regarding the recovery of an agricultural loan. The defendants defaulted on repayment, prompting the bank to seek legal action.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of KERALA GRAMIN BANK to recover an amount of ₹2,16,290 with interest. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayment.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Amount of ₹2,16,290 with future interest @ 11% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of KERALA GRAMIN BANK to recover an amount of ₹2,16,290 with interest. The defendants defaulted on their loan repayment.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.
Supporting Evidence
On a perusal of plaint, proof affidavit and documents the claim of the plaintiff to realize the amount from the defendants stands unchallenged and undisputed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
KERALA GRAMIN BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
THRESIAMMA
Party Age
71
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
KUTTICHAN
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
ROY THOMAS
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
MANOJ
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Memorandum of Agreement for Agricultural loans, Statement of Account of K. M. Thomas, Copy of Lawyer Notice sent to defendants, Postal Receipts, Unclaimed cover, Acknowledgment Cards.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. Anoop
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P. M. Previn
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Amaya. V
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Abdul Raoof. V. P
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover the loan amount along with future interest.
Evidence:
Hence, the suit is decreed with costs as follows: The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,16,290/- (Rupees Two Lakhs Sixteen Thousand Two Hundred and Ninety only) with future interest @ 11% per annum from the date of suit till the date of realization.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Memorandum of agreement for agricultural loans
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the loan agreement executed by Thomas. K. M in favor of the Plaintiff Bank.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Statement of Account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This statement provides the account details of K. M. Thomas related to the agricultural loan.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This notice was sent by Adv. P. Anoop to the defendants regarding the loan default.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence of the service of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3 (a)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence of the service of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3 (b)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence of the service of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3 (c)
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Supporting evidence of the service of lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A3 (d)
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
A document pertaining to the service of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment related to the unclaimed cover.
Reference:
Ext.A4 (a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of delivery received from defendant D2.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Unclaimed Cover
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the service of notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment related to the unclaimed cover.
Reference:
Ext.A6 (a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of delivery received from defendant D4.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THRESIAMMA et al regarding recovery of loan amount
Case Code Year
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs THRESIAMMA et al regarding recovery of loan amount

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District, Kerala State
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Tue, 07/02/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Sat, 04/05/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JITHIN RAJ. K. T. K, RAJAN. K. T. K regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won