Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 115/2024

Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money

Court
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-03-22
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Canara Bank suing Jagath Chandran and Chandran for not repaying an educational loan. The defendants admitted their default but sought more time to repay the debt.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff with an order for the defendants to pay the principal amount with interest, while penal interest was denied.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
An amount of ₹2,91,733.22/- with interest @ 10.75% per annum from the date of suit till realization
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was decreed in favor of the plaintiff with an order for the defendants to pay the principal amount with interest, while penal interest was denied.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The defendants admitted to the debt and expressed willingness to pay.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The defendants admitted to the debt and expressed willingness to pay.
Supporting Evidence
Since, the defendants filed a conceding written statement stating that, they are ready to pay the decree debt within 1 year, the suit is decreed.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
CANARA BANK
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
JAGATH CHANDRAN
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
CHANDRAN
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. K. K. Ratheesh Kumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Stephin. P. Wilson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff bank is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,91,733.22 with interest @ 10.75% per annum.
Evidence:
the suit is decreed with costs. The plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of ₹2,91,733.22 with interest @ 10.75% per annum, from the date of suit till the date of realization.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Claim of penal interest of 2% denied as it is against RBI regulations.
Evidence:
the claim of penal interest of 2% is denied as it is against RBI regulations.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between CANARA BANK vs JAGATH CHANDRAN et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
Kozhikode District, Kerala
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF INDIA et al vs SURESH KUMAR. T regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs JITHIN RAJ. K. T. K, RAJAN. K. T. K regarding realization of money
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs MUNEER. K. V regarding recovery of loan amount.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between KERALA GRAMIN BANK vs MOLLY regarding realization of money
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between CANARA BANK, KUTTIADY BRANCH vs AKHIL . P. T et al regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won