Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RPIA. No. 23/2024

Case between Rajeevan vs Naseema et al regarding setting aside an exparte order

Court
Court of the Munsiff
Judge
Sri. Yadukrishnan. B
Order Date
2025-04-08
Duration
approximately-7 months 6 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Rajeevan filed a petition to set aside an exparte order citing health issues that prevented him from instructing his Counsel. The court found the medical certificate presented insufficient and ineffective.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The petition to set aside the exparte order was dismissed by the court, which found no valid reason for the delay.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition to set aside the exparte order was dismissed by the court, which found no valid reason for the delay.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined that the medical certificate was inadequate and did not justify the request.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined that the medical certificate was inadequate and did not justify the request.
Supporting Evidence
The court found the medical certificate produced by the petitioner insufficient due to inconsistencies.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, RPIA is dismissed with costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rajeevan
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Naseema
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o. Late Abdul Salam
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Thasneema
Party Age
26
Relation
D/o. Late Abdul Salam
Plaintiffs Documents
Medical certificate for back pain.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M. Ragesh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. A. Santhosh
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Petition to set aside the exparte order dated 2/9/24.
Evidence:
Hence, there is no bonafide reason to set aside the exparte order dated 2/9/24. In the result, RPIA is dismissed with costs.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Medical Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The medical certificate was produced to support the petitioner's claim of being unable to give instructions due to back pain.
Reference:

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Rajeevan vs Naseema et al regarding setting aside an exparte order
Case Code Year
Case between Rajeevan vs Naseema et al regarding setting aside an exparte order

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between null vs null regarding null
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Unknown
Case between JDs vs null regarding decree debt
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Kavilumpara Rural Employees And Workers Welfare Co Operative Society et al vs Ranjith A et al regarding EP.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Plaintiff Won
Case between IRINGANNOOR SERVICE CO OPERATIVE BANK LTD et al vs KUNHIRAMAN et al regarding default dismissal.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Defendant Won
Case between Vinodan NIRAN V G vs Vijayan regarding EP dismissal
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Civil Case Defendant Won