| Niyamam AI

Displaying 921 - 925 of 21881

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between John Joseph vs John Daniyel et al regarding partition of property

Civil Suit

O.S 140/2022

Kanjirappally

2025-01-31

approximately-2 years 6 months

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between M/s Pan Marketting vs Sri. Jobin Mathew @ George et al regarding realization of money

Civil Suit

O.S 200/2022

Kanjirappally

2025-01-31

approximately-3 years 11 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Abdul Rasaque vs Nazar et al regarding a civil suit.

Civil Suit

O.S 116/2020

Kanjirappally Taluk

2025-01-31

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Manjunadhan vs Vijayappan Nair et al regarding cancellation of sale deeds and specific performance.

Civil Suit

O.S 13/2019

Kanjirappally

2025-01-31

approximately-6 years 5 months

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Joseph V.C. vs Antony @ Kuttappan, Anil Antony regarding Mandatory injunction

Civil Suit

O.S 74/2020

Kanjirappally

2025-01-31

approximately-4 years 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

49%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 21,803 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 3.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 12%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 1214 cases)
Sale deed (in 964 cases)
Postal receipt (in 953 cases)
Tax receipt (in 826 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 804 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 10751
Defendant Won: 9603

9639

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

30%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Batta

Plaintiffs often failed to make required payment of batta, leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 30 cases (30%) High Impact

Lack of Evidence Provided

Plaintiffs frequently did not produce adequate evidence to prove their claims, resulting in dismissals.

Found in 28 cases (28%) Medium Impact

Failure to Take Steps

Dismissing petitions due to plaintiffs' failure to take necessary procedural steps, like issuing notices.

Found in 24 cases (24%) Medium Impact

Absence of Petitioners

Cases were dismissed because petitioners did not appear in court for hearings or proceedings.

Found in 18 cases (18%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Batta

Lack of Evidence Provided

Failure to Take Steps

Absence of Petitioners

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?