Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 140/2022

Case between John Joseph vs John Daniyel et al regarding partition of property

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
approximately-2 years 6 months
Case Code No.
140
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

John Joseph, the plaintiff, seeks partition of properties inherited from his late father, Daniel John, against John Daniyel and Valsamma John, the defendants. The case involves claims over shares from the estate after the father's death.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting him 11/15 shares of the properties, while the defendants were allotted 2/15 shares each. The counterclaim was dismissed.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of properties into shares as specified.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court ruled in favor of the plaintiff, granting him 11/15 shares of the properties, while the defendants were allotted 2/15 shares each. The counterclaim was dismissed.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found the documents evidencing the shares valid and upheld the rights of the plaintiff according to the law of inheritance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court found the documents evidencing the shares valid and upheld the rights of the plaintiff according to the law of inheritance.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence available on records would show that the properties were divided as per law among mother and children. 1/3 rd right of mother and 2/15 right of 2 sisters were transferred to plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: 1. The plaint schedule item No.1 and 2 properties shall be divided into 15 equal parts each, of which 11/15 shares are allotted to plaintiff, 2/15 shares are allotted to defendant 1. Defendant 2 is entitled for 2/15 shares.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
John Joseph
Party Age
52
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
John Daniyel
Party Age
56
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsamma John
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No. 5337/1985, Sale deed No. 4608/1985, Death certificate of Daniel John.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sony Thomas
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
B. Bijoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.P. Sanalkumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for partition of plaint schedule properties.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule item No.1 and 2 properties shall be divided into 15 equal parts each, of which 11/15 shares are allotted to plaintiff, 2/15 shares are allotted to defendant 1. Defendant 2 is entitled for 2/15 shares.
Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Prayer for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction.
Evidence:
Hence the prayer for a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction is liable to be dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership of plaint schedule properties by the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proves ownership of plaint schedule properties by the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the death of the plaintiff's father.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfers share of the property from the plaintiff's mother.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfers share of the property from Susamma John.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfers share of the property from the plaintiff's mother.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Transfers share of the property from Susamma John.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Form of Patta
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the land ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A12
Document Type: Form of Order of Assignment
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the land ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A13
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document showing tax payment related to the property.
Reference:
Ext.A14

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Mon, 01/31/2022 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Ommen Chacko vs Chacko Chacko et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema et al vs Muhammed Ismail regarding partition of property.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema et al vs Muhammed Ismail regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won