Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 219/2021

Case between Naseema et al vs Muhammed Ismail regarding partition of property.

Court
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-27
Duration
approximately-3 years 3 months
Case Code No.
219
Case Closed
Thu, 02/27/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Naseema and others, are seeking a partition of property that devolved after their father's death. The defendant, Muhammed Ismail, is contesting the claims regarding the partitioning of the property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit for partition is decreed, allowing the plaintiffs to divide the property into equal parts among themselves and the defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaint schedule property shall be divided into 9 equal parts.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit for partition is decreed, allowing the plaintiffs to divide the property into equal parts among themselves and the defendant.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The property is partible among the parties and the plaintiffs established their claim.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The property is partible among the parties and the plaintiffs established their claim.
Supporting Evidence
The evidence showed that the property belonged to the deceased father of the parties and was partible.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The plaint schedule property shall be divided into 9 equal parts, of which plaintiffs 1 to 3 are allotted 1/9 shares severally and plaintiffs 4 and 5 are allotted 2/9 shares severally. Defendant 1 is entitled for 2/9 shares.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Naseema
Party Age
72
Relation
W/o Usman
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Rahuma Beevi
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o Thambikkannu
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Saleema P.S.
Party Age
63
Relation
W/o Muhammdaly
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammad Rafi
Party Age
54
Relation
S/o Ibrahim
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Muhammed Abbas
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o Ibrahim
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Muhammed Ismail
Party Age
57
Relation
S/o Ibrahim
Plaintiffs Documents
Sale deed No. 4246/1124 of SRO, Kanjirappally, Land Tax receipt No. K05021207334/2023, Death certificate of P.M. Ibrahim, Death certificate of Subaitha Ibrahim.
Defendants Documents
Family Settlement (Subject to proof), Land tax receipt No. KL05021205735/2024, Land Tax receipt No. KL05021205733/2024.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. V.K. Somasekharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. K.S. Muhammed Haris
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiffs are granted 3/9 shares and defendant 2/9 shares in the partition of the property.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule property shall be divided into 9 equal parts, of which plaintiffs 1 to 3 are allotted 1/9 shares severally and plaintiffs 3 and 4 are allotted 2/9 shares severally.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the ownership of the plaint schedule property by the father of the plaintiffs.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document supports the ownership and tax payment for the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the death of the plaintiffs' father, establishing inheritance.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Death Certificate
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document verifies the death of the plaintiffs' mother, establishing inheritance.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Family Settlement
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document was discussed as a photocopy regarding the partition but was deemed unreliable.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is related to the defendant's claim to property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Land Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
This document is related to the defendant's claim to property ownership.
Reference:
Ext.B3

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Partition of property
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Sat, 11/27/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/27/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between John Joseph vs John Daniyel et al regarding partition of property
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Ommen Chacko vs Chacko Chacko et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.E.Shaji et al vs P. Pathumuthu et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Naseema et al vs Muhammed Ismail regarding partition of property
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won