Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 116/2020

Case between Abdul Rasaque vs Nazar et al regarding a civil suit.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-01-31
Duration
Case Code No.
116
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Abdul Rasaque as the plaintiff and multiple defendants including Nazar, Ibrahim, and others. It concerns the terms of compromise related to the civil suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court allowed the compromise and decreed the suit in terms of compromise.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the compromise and decreed the suit in terms of compromise.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The terms of compromise are lawful and duly recorded.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The terms of compromise are lawful and duly recorded.
Supporting Evidence
Terms of compromise are lawful. Compromise is recorded.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, the suit is decreed in terms of compromise. Compromise petition and Ext.C1 plan shall form part of the decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abdul Rasaque
Party Age
60
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nazar
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ibrahim
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Subaida @ Pennikkutty
Party Age
67
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Safiya
Party Age
64
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sabeena
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Nil
Defendants Documents
Nil

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Darly M. Sebastian
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Muhammed Shameer P.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
T.S. Rajeswaran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.
Evidence:
Compromise is recorded. Suit is decreed in terms of compromise.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Survey Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
The court used the survey plan to assess the lawful terms of the compromise.
Reference:
Ext.C1

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2020

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won