Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 231/2022

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
Case Code No.
231
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and several defendants including Dhanya S. and Silamban M. The matter revolves around the non-payment of balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was rejected due to the non-payment of the balance court fee, with no costs assigned.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the non-payment of the balance court fee, with no costs assigned.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected for failure to pay the required court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected for failure to pay the required court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance court fee is not paid.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Union Bank of India
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhanya S.
Party Age
33
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Silamban M.
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Azhakumani
Party Age
58
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Clareness Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Reny Joseph
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk, Kottayam District
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Anjana Pradeep et al regarding court fee balance.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Canara Bank vs Ann Mariya Jose et al regarding dismissal of suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs George Sebastian regarding mediation settlement
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Union Bank of India vs Fazil Y. Salim et al regarding service of process
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Aby Jose vs The Canara Bank regarding dismissal for default
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won