Case Summary
The case involves Union Bank of India as the plaintiff and several defendants including Dhanya S. and Silamban M. The matter revolves around the non-payment of balance court fee, leading to the rejection of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was rejected due to the non-payment of the balance court fee, with no costs assigned.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was rejected for failure to pay the required court fee.
The suit was rejected for failure to pay the required court fee.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was rejected for failure to pay the required court fee.
The suit was rejected for failure to pay the required court fee.
Supporting Evidence
Balance court fee is not paid.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Union Bank of India
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Dhanya S.
- Party Age
- 33
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Silamban M.
- Party Age
- 59
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Azhakumani
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Clareness Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Reny Joseph
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Rejected
Description:
Suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Evidence:
Hence suit is rejected for non-payment of balance court fee.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2022