Case Summary
Aby Jose is the plaintiff in this case against The Canara Bank and its representatives. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was absent and did not present evidence, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Key Reasoning:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Why Defendant Won:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff is absent. No representation. Not ready to adduce evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default. No costs.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aby Jose
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- The Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Regional Manager, Canara Bank
- Relation
- Represented by
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K.P. Sanalkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Tharakan & George Associates
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Bibin Varghese
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
Suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023