Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S 268/2023

Case between Abraham Mathew et al vs Suresh Raman et al regarding suit dismissal

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kanjirappally
Judge
Smitha Susan Mathew
Order Date
2025-02-28
Duration
Case Code No.
268
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Abraham Mathew and Martin Mathew, represented by their brother Sebastian Mathew, are involved in a suit against defendants Suresh Raman and Abhilash S. The case was ultimately dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed as not pressed, meaning they did not pursue the case further.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit filed by the plaintiffs was dismissed as not pressed, meaning they did not pursue the case further.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiffs did not pursue the case.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Supporting Evidence
Learned counsel for plaintiff endorsed that the suit is not pressed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Abraham Mathew
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Martin Mathew
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sebastian Mathew
Party Age
56
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suresh Raman
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Abhilash S.
Party Age
50
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.A. George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Visakh S. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Bilu G.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Shamon Shaji
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Prasanth P. Prabha
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is not pressed.
Evidence:
Learned counsel for plaintiff endorsed that the suit is not pressed. Suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Common Reasons
Case Code
O.S
Case Code Year
2023

Quick Facts

Location
Kanjirappally Taluk
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kanjirappally
Case Filed
Case Closed
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 02/28/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dhanya S., Silamban M. et al regarding non-payment of court fee.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mini, Maya, Leena vs Rajappan, Komalam, Subhash et al regarding a civil suit
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayath regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Joseph Antony et al vs C. M. M Educational and Charitable Trust regarding Interlocutory Application
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Anilkumar vs Chirakkadavu Grama Panchayat regarding withdrawal of suit.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KANJIRAPPALLY
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won