| Niyamam AI- Beta

Displaying 6061 - 6065 of 9543

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Case between Saarakutti vs V P Peter et al regarding objection to decree execution

Claim Petition under Order XXI Rule 97 of CPC

E.A. 162/2025

PERUMBAVOOR

2025-12-17

1 year 30 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between The Federal Bank Ltd. Keezhillam Branch vs Anagha Mariya Siby et al regarding suit dismissal

Civil Suit

OS.202/2023

2025-12-06

Dismissed

View Full Details

Case between Paulose vs Sibi et al regarding Default Judgment

Civil Suit

O. S. No.348/2020

2025-12-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Mammu vs Mathew et al regarding Suit Dismissal

Civil Suit

O. S. No.387/2020

2025-12-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Ameena Makkar et al vs Aji et al regarding Suit dismissal for default

Civil Suit

OS.460/2020

Perumbavoor

2025-12-06

Defendant

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

Disclaimer: This is informational analysis based on historical data, not legal advice. Every case is unique. Consult a qualified lawyer for personalized guidance.

51%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 9,543 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 2.5 years

Settlement Likelihood 13%

Common Winning Factors:

Commission Report (in 458 cases)
Lawyer Notice (in 418 cases)
Sale deed (in 382 cases)
Postal receipt (in 246 cases)
Tax receipt (in 231 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 4912
Defendant Won: 3693

3693

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

25%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Cases were frequently dismissed for plaintiffs not paying required batta fees for proceeding.

Found in 25 cases (25%) High Impact

Absence of Evidence Presented

Plaintiffs often failed due to insufficient evidence demonstrating the means of respondents to pay debts.

Found in 22 cases (22%) High Impact

Non-Representation of Petitioner

Petitions were dismissed as plaintiffs did not appear or represent their cases in court.

Found in 20 cases (20%) Medium Impact

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

Many cases failed as plaintiffs did not take steps to issue notice to respondents timely.

Found in 15 cases (15%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Default Due to Non-Payment of Batta

Absence of Evidence Presented

Non-Representation of Petitioner

Failure to Issue Necessary Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?