Case Summary
Case involving Paulose and multiple defendants Sibi et al. Plaintiff was absent, resulting in a default judgment in favor of the defendants.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Plaintiff was absent, leading to suit dismissal with costs in favor of defendants.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. Suit in published list. Since plaintiff absent. Defendant present. Suit dismissed for default with cost. Pronounced by me in open court on this the 6ᵗʰ day of December, 2025. Sd/- SUMEY CHANDRAN. Civil Judge (Junior Division)
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Paulose
- Party Age
- 60
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sibi
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Paulose
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joby
- Party Age
- 44
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Joy
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Paulose vs Sibi et al regarding Default Judgment
Case Code Year
Case between Paulose vs Sibi et al regarding Default Judgment