| Niyamam AI

Displaying 161 - 165 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Muhammed vs Jamal Moideen regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition No. 674/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-06-30

0 years, 4 months, 11 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between V.P. Musthafa vs Union Bank of India regarding restoration petition

Civil Case - Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 893/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-06-29

0 years, 3 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Sainaba et al vs Eralamkalayil Unniyalan et al regarding petition restoration

Civil Suit - Petition Restoration

Restor.Ptn 695/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-06-25

0 years, 4 months, 2 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Lakshmi-P1 vs Devaki regarding payment of cost

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 201/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-06-15

0 years, 5 months, 0 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Fathima vs Theyyath Thanku et al regarding restoration of suit

Civil Suit - Restoration

Restor.Ptn 957/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2015-06-12

0 years, 2 months, 24 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

41.38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (41.38%) High Impact

Lack of Representation for Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (25.86%) Medium Impact

Failure to Present Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often did not provide required documentation, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 8 cases (13.79%) Medium Impact

Default in Issuing Notices

Plaintiffs commonly failed to issue necessary notices to defendants, leading to dismissals.

Found in 7 cases (12.07%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Representation for Plaintiff

Failure to Present Necessary Documents

Default in Issuing Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?