Case Summary
Petitioner Fathima filed a restoration petition which was allowed by the court to restore the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Restoration of lawsuit
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the petition for restoration of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
No objection heard. I am satisfied about the grounds stated in the petition.
Judgment Evidence:
No objection heard. I am satisfied about the grounds stated in the petition. Hence the petition is allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Fathima
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Theyyath Thanku
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subaida
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rasiya
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Santha
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Pradceep
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Laiju
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sarojini
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.Vijayakumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- U.Sainudheen
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.P.Shiyas
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of lawsuit
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition for restoration of the suit was allowed.
Evidence:
No objection heard. I am satisfied about the grounds stated in the petition. Hence the petition is allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Restoration
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2015