Case Summary
Muhammed filed a restoration petition against Jamal Moideen. The court allowed the petition and set aside a previous decree.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Setting aside of previous decree
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court allowed the restoration petition and set aside a previous decree.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed. Decreed dated 17-1-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 674/15.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Muhammed
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Jamal Moideen
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- M.K.Moosakutty
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Advocate appearing for Jamal Moideen
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Setting aside of previous decree
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Setting aside of the decree dated 17-1-2015 per order in IA 674/15
Evidence:
Cost paid. Petition stands allowed. Decreed dated 17-1-2015 is set aside vide order in IA 674/15.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Muhammed vs Jamal Moideen regarding restoration petition
Case Code Year
Case between Muhammed vs Jamal Moideen regarding restoration petition