| Niyamam AI

Displaying 111 - 115 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Panikkottil Kunhimuhammed vs Kuttan et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 1245/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-03-10

1 year, 9 months, 18 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Kannachampat Radhakrishan vs Payyapantha Salgunan regarding setting aside exparte order

Civil Suit

Restor.] Ptn 1684/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-01-24

0 years, 5 months, 5 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Mundi and Chandaran vs Kunhahammed et al regarding restoration of the case

Civil Suit

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO.1651 OF 2016

Tirur

2017-01-21

3 years

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Devaki Amma et al vs Mangatt Devaki Amma et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition No. 774/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-07-29

0 years, 5 months, 12 days

Unknown

View Full Details

Case between Thalhath vs Muthu et al regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restor.Ptn 790/2016

Tirur, Malappuram

2016-07-22

0 years, 4 months, 19 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

41.38%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Plaintiffs frequently failed to pay necessary fees leading to case dismissals for default.

Found in 24 cases (41.38%) High Impact

Lack of Representation for Plaintiff

Many cases were dismissed due to the absence of plaintiffs during court proceedings.

Found in 15 cases (25.86%) Medium Impact

Failure to Present Necessary Documents

Plaintiffs often did not provide required documentation, resulting in case dismissals for default.

Found in 8 cases (13.79%) Medium Impact

Default in Issuing Notices

Plaintiffs commonly failed to issue necessary notices to defendants, leading to dismissals.

Found in 7 cases (12.07%) Low Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Non-Payment of Required Fees

Lack of Representation for Plaintiff

Failure to Present Necessary Documents

Default in Issuing Notices

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?