Case Summary
Thalhath filed a restoration petition against Muthu and Subair, where parties agreed to allow the petition on specific terms after the earlier petition was allowed on payment of costs.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed after the parties agreed to specific terms, and the matter was restored to the file.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms.
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms.
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms.
Supporting Evidence
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms.
Judgment Evidence:
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms. Considering the fact that this is the second application and earlier petition allowed on payment of cost of Rs 5000/- to decide the matter suit restored to file on payment of Rs 8000/- to defendants. For payment of cost. Cost paid. Petition allowed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Thalhath
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Muthu @ Abdruahiman
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Subair
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Restoration of petition
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Restoring the matter to the file after payment of costs
Evidence:
Parties consented to allow the IA on terms. Considering the fact that this is the second application and earlier petition allowed on payment of cost of Rs 5000/- to decide the matter suit restored to file on payment of Rs 8000/- to defendants. For payment of cost. Cost paid. Petition allowed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Case Restoration and Delays
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2016