| Niyamam AI

Displaying 86 - 90 of 245

District

Court Establishment

Public case category

Case Summary

Parties/Entities involved(eg: Bank, Panchayath, temple, Mosque etc.)

Case between Mariyamu et al vs Mukthar regarding suit restoration

Civil Suit

EP 157/2016

Tirur,Malappuram

2017-07-20

1 year, 1 month, 5 days

Defendant

View Full Details

Case between Yusaf Sakhafi vs Alavi Haji regarding relief petition

Restoration Petition

Restor. 1087/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-17

0 years, 3 months, 16 days

Petitioner

View Full Details

Case between Marunnum Kuzhiyil Asokan vs Leela regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition No.1194/2017

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-07-01

0 years, 1 months, 9 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Prajeesh and Ajeesh vs Chathencheri Beeran et al regarding exparte decree set aside

Civil Procedure - Order IX Rule 13

INTERLOCUTORY APPLICATION NO. 53 OF 2017

Tirur

2017-06-29

3 years

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Case between Shanavas vs Vodafone Essar Cellular Ltd., and Indus Towers Ltd. regarding restoration petition

Restoration Petition

Restoration Petition 678/2015

Tirur, Malappuram

2017-06-29

2 years, 4 months, 16 days

Plaintiff

View Full Details

Historical Outcome Trends

Based on analysis of similar cases in Kerala Munsif Courts

AI & Machine Learning Estimate

These figures are produced by statistical and machine-learning analysis of past court judgments. They are not legal advice and not a prediction about your own case. Every case turns on its own facts — please consult a qualified lawyer before making any decision.

59%

Success Rate for Plaintiff

Based on 245 similar cases

Key Insights

Documentary Evidence Strength High Impact

Average Case Duration 0.7 years

Settlement Likelihood 2%

Common Winning Factors:

Unknown (in 2 cases)

Plaintiff Won: 144
Defendant Won: 58

Cases Failed

Primary Reasons

39.66%

Top Reason Occurrence

Common Failure Reasons

Learn why cases like yours failed so you can avoid mistakes

Failure to Pay Necessary Fees

Plaintiffs often failed to fulfill required fee payments, leading to case dismissal.

Found in 23 cases (39.66%) High Impact

Lack of Representation at Hearings

Absence of plaintiffs during court hearings contributed significantly to case dismissals.

Found in 18 cases (31.03%) High Impact

Non-payment of Batta

Failure to deposit batta for processes such as issuing notice or arrest warrants resulted in case dismissals.

Found in 16 cases (27.59%) Medium Impact

Inadequate Document Submission

Plaintiffs frequently failed to produce necessary documents, impacting the validity of their petitions.

Found in 14 cases (24.14%) Medium Impact

How to Strengthen Your Case

Gather all documentary evidence (title deeds, receipts, contracts) before filing
Ensure filing is within limitation period - consult lawyer about deadlines
Prepare witnesses thoroughly and ensure their statements are consistent
Maintain complete chain of ownership documents with no gaps
Follow all procedural requirements and court timelines strictly

Need More Details?

View complete analysis of failed cases in your category

Kerala Civil Court Judgments Database

Public User

Legal Professional

similar cases search

Historical Outcome Trends

Key Insights

Common Winning Factors:

Common Failure Reasons

Failure to Pay Necessary Fees

Lack of Representation at Hearings

Non-payment of Batta

Inadequate Document Submission

How to Strengthen Your Case

Need More Details?